Superficies – from Roman to Ukrainian Law

О. А. Сурженко

Abstract


A notion of superficies under a Roman Law as a material right, which has initially emerged in public relations, and further has formed as a private special property, is explained. The nature of this right was also changing – leasing relationships, being binding, yielded to proprietary relations. Personal right (based on an agreement and bound to a person directly) was replaced by legal regulation of material right (bound directly to an item of property – a lot) as well. This gave substantial advantages in exercising of and protecting such a right by its subject. The process of transformation of the nature of development right came amid (or even was conditioned by) a special remedy, provided by a praetor. This right remained like this on the territories, belonging to Ukraine, until mid 1920s and was regulated in the Civil Code of Ukrainian SSR of 1922 as development right. At the same time its regulating was incomplete, and as the experience has shown, it didn't meet legal schemes of that time, and proceeded forming peculiarities and it received the name “Soviet Law” in following years. The reason for that was empery of a doctrine of state property and practical elimination of private property, all the more so the land title. That is why grounds for existing of such a material right as superficies vanished. A way of superficies regulating in Ukrainian law as prototype of superficies of Soviet times and superficies recovery in the Civil Code of Ukraine of 2003 is traced. In Sowiet Period development was regulated on the territory of Ukraine, but on a lot, belonging to the state. A situation is in a way similar to developer right to use non
2
owned lot for building was formed. But the vital difference was the fact, that natural persons became owners of buildings, constructed on a non-owned lot. It was this fact, which was a problem during superifices regulation recovery in the Civil Code of Ukraine of 2003. Succession of modern Ukrainian superficies civil regulating from its regulating by Soviet Ukrainian Law provides that owners of buildings couldn't be deprived of their right with adoption of the Civil Code of 2003. This implies vital differences between superficies regulating under Roman Law and the law of modern Ukraine. The main one therefrom is the fact, that superficies in fact does not involve ownership right to a building, constructed on non-owned lot. That is why a rather unique situation has formed, when superficies, being a private special property, didn't involve legal regime of construction. Main characteristics of supreficies by means of determining its object, subjects, their rights and obligations, grounds for emerging and protection are given.


Keywords


special property; superficies; development right; ownership right; real estate

References


Дождев Д. В. Римское частное право : учеб. для вузов / Д. В. Дождев ; под ред.

В. С. Нерсесянцю. – М. : Норма, Инфра-М, 1996. – С. 423–427.

Пухта Г. Ф. Курс римского гражданского права / Г.Ф. Пухта ; пер. с посл. нем.

изд. проф. Рудорффа. – Т. 1. – М. : Ф. Н. Плевако, 1874. – С. 456–451.

Косарев А. И. Римское право / А. И. Косарев ; отв. ред. Е. А. Скрипилев. – М. :

Юрид. лит., 1986. – 160 с.

Римское частное право : учеб. / науч. ред.: И. Б. Новицкий, И. С. Перетерский. –

М. : Юрид. изд-во МЮ СССР, 1948. – С. 230.

Підопригора О. А. Основи римського приватного права / О. А. Підопригора. – К. :

Вентурі, 1997. – 368 с.

Михайленко О. О. Речово-правові обмеження права приватної власності за стародавнім

римським та сучасним цивільним правом України : автореф. дис. ... канд. юрид. наук : 12.00.03 /

О. О. Михайленко ; Нац. юрид. акад. України ім. Я. Мудрого. – Х., 2003. – 20 с.

Шимон С. І. Теорія майнових прав як об’єктів цивільних правовідносин /

С. І. Шимон. – К. : Юрінком Інтер, 2014. – 664 с.

Спасибо-Фатєєва І. В. Поняття нерухомого майна та права на нього / І. В. Спасибо-

Фатєєва // Українське комерційне право. – 2009. – № 9. – С. 10–19.

Цивільний кодекс України : наук.-практ. коментар (пояснення, тлумачення,9

рекомендації з використанням позицій вищих судових інстанцій, Міністерства юстиції,

науковців, фахівців) / за ред. проф. І. В. Спасибо-Фатєєвої. – Х. : Страйд, 2011. – Т. 5: Право

власності та інші речові права. – С. 612–622.

Настечко К. О. Оформлення прав на земельні ділянки : монографія /

К. О. Настечко ; Нац. акад. наук України, Ін-т держави і права ім. В. М. Корецького. – К. :

Юрінком Інтер, 2012. – 238 с.

Пидопригора О. А. Курс римского частного права : учеб. / О. А. Пидопригора ; под

ред. Д. В. Дождева. – М. : Бек, 2000, 400 с.

Цивільний кодекс Української РСР / Міністерство юстиції Української РСР. – К. :

Держполiтвидав, 1959. – 77 с.


GOST Style Citations






DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2014.2.63178

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Теорія і практика правознавства

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2225-6555