Review of Court Judgements on Newly Discovered Circumstances and Access to Court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2025.28.347612Keywords:
access to court, right to a fair trial, European Convention on Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights, review of court decisions on newly discovered circumstances, review of court decisionsAbstract
.
References
Zeldina, O. R., & Kolesnyk, R. M. (2017). The institute of review of court decisions on newly discovered circumstances. Pravo i suspilstvo, (4, Pt. 1), 89–95.
Lavrov, V. V. (2023). Review of court decisions on newly discovered or exceptional circumstances in civil proceedings. PhD thesis. Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Meniuk, D. O. (2021). Review of court decisions based on newly discovered or exceptional circumstances in the civil procedure of Ukraine. PhD thesis. Kyiv.
Senyk, S., & Oprysko, M. (2015). Problems of theory and practice of review of court decisions on newly discovered circumstances in civil proceedings. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo, (9), 22–26.
Rudenko, O. A. (2023). Subjects of the right to apply for review of a court decision based on newly discovered circumstances in administrative proceedings. Halytski studii: Yurydychni nauky, (2), 53–57.
Stepanov, S. V. (2010). Review of commercial court decisions on newly discovered circumstances (PhD dissertation). Odesa.
Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court. (2020, April 8). Ruling in case No. 2018/2-3638/11. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/88834134
Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court. (2025, September 24). Ruling in case No. 205/5860/21. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/130710578
Golder v. the United Kingdom, App. No. 4451/70 (European Court of Human Rights, 1975). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57496%22]}
Zubac v. Croatia, App. No. 40160/12 (European Court of Human Rights, April 5, 2018). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-181821
Komarov, V. V., & Tsuvina, T. A. (2021). International standard of access to justice and subject of civil procedural law. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 28(3), 197–208.
Serhieieva, A., & Tsuvina, T. (2023). Access to justice in civil cases: Filling the gap in the sustainable development agenda. In A. Bartolacelli & D. Sagatiene (Eds.), Law and sustainability: Perspectives for Lithuania and beyond (pp. 241–256). Kraków.
Izarova, I., & Horban, N. (2021). About equal access to justice in a contemporary world. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 4(2), 5–7.
Pérez de Rada Cavanilles v. Spain, App. No. 28090/95, § 24 (European Court of Human Rights, 1998).
MPP Golub v. Ukraine, App. No. 6778/05 (European Court of Human Rights, 2005).
Hadjianastassiou v. Greece, App. No. 12945/87, §§ 32–37 (European Court of Human Rights, December 16, 1992).
Industrial Financial Consortium Investment Metallurgical Union v. Ukraine, App. No. 10640/05 (European Court of Human Rights, June 26, 2018).
Pilkov, K. (2022). Reopening cases following judgments of the European Court of Human Rights: Room for a European consensus? Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 4(16), 1–28.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Тетяна Цувіна
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
