From Concept to Reality: UJICS as the Next Stage in the Development of E-Justice in Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2025.2%20(28).346098Keywords:
e-justice, UJITS, UJICS, digitalization of justice, judiciary of UkraineAbstract
The study focuses on analyzing the current stage of e-justice development in Ukraine, particularly in the context of transitioning from the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System (UJITS) to a new conceptual model, the Unified Judicial Information and Communication System (UJICS). The relevance of the research is determined by the need to modernize Ukraine’s judicial system in accordance with European standards of digital justice, as well as to overcome existing organizational, technical, and regulatory shortcomings in its functioning. The article emphasizes that e-justice is not only a technological phenomenon but also a tool for ensuring the procedural rights of parties and providing accessible, transparent, and efficient judicial proceedings. The purpose of this article is to examine the evolution of e-justice in Ukraine, analyze the legal nature, technical, and organizational features of the UJICS Concept, and identify the prospects and risks associated with its implementation. The methodological framework combines dialectical, systemic-structural, comparative-legal, historical-legal, and formal-logical methods, which enable a comprehensive assessment of the development of e-justice. The research findings indicate that UJITS has become the foundation of digital justice in Ukraine, ensuring the basic digitalization of judicial processes; however, its architecture remains fragmented and technologically limited. Meanwhile, the UJICS Concept is proposed as a centralized, integrated ecosystem designed to unify all judicial processes, introduce artificial intelligence, big data analytics, and modern cybersecurity tools. At the same time, key risks have been identified - insufficient funding, technical challenges, regulatory uncertainty, and the impact of martial law. It is concluded that the successful implementation of the UJICS Concept requires stable financing, involvement of international partners, legislative modernization, and strengthening of cybersecurity. Under current economic and political conditions, the UJITS continues to serve as the practical foundation of e-justice, while the UJICS remains a strategic goal for the further digital transformation of Ukraine’s judiciary.
References
Contini, F. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Humans, Law and Technology Interactions in Judicial Proceedings. Law, Technology and Humans, 2,(1), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.5204/lthj.v2i1.1478.
Kallinikos, J. (2005). The Order of Technology: Complexity and Control in a Connected World. Information and Organization, 15(3), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2005.02.001.
Yavuz, N., Karkin, N., & Yildiz, M. (2022). E-Justice: A Review and Agenda for Future Research. In Scientific Foundations of Digital Governance and Transformation: Concepts, Approaches and Challenges (pp. 385-414). Springer International Publishing.
Gordienko, A., Najafli, E., Kobko, Y., Savenko, V., & Korostashova, I. (2024). Legal Regulation of E-courts in Ukraine as an Element of Access to Justice for the Protection of Individual Rights. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 12(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v12i1.1316.
Popov, O.I. (2018). The Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System as a Means of Ensuring the Efficiency of Civil Proceedings. In Information Technologies in Culture, Art, Education, Science, Economy and Law: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 386–388). Kyiv: Publishing Center of KNUKiM.
Decision of the High Council of Justice No. 1845/0/15-21 "On Approval of the Regulation on the Procedure for Functioning of Certain Subsystems (Modules) of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System". (August 17, 2021). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v1845910-21#Text.
Zaplotynskyi, B.A. (2018). Electronic Justice: Lecture notes. Kyiv: Department of Management and Information Technologies, Kyiv Institute of Intellectual Property and Law of the National University "Odesa Law Academy". Retrieved from http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/handle/11300/11107.
Hetmantsev, M.O. (2017). The Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System: Reality and Challenges of today. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 4, 179-183. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Pgip_2017_4_38.
Volobuieva, O., Leheza, Ye., Pervii, V., Plokhuta, Ye., & Pichko, R. (2023). Criminal and Administrative Legal Characteristics of Offenses in the Field of Countering Drug Trafficking: Insights from Ukraine. Yustisia, 12(3), 262-277. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia. v12i3.79443.
Electronic Court Failures Violate Constitutional Guarantees. (February 29, 2024). The Ukrainian National Bar Association. Retrieved from https://unba.org.ua/news/8868-zboi-elektronnogo-sudu-porushuyut-konstitucijni-garantii-naau.html.
Reiling, D., & Contini, F. (2022). E-justice Platforms: Challenges for Judicial Governance. International Journal for Court Administration, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.445.
Abou Refaie, R., & Santuber, J. (2023). Risks and Challenges to e-Justice Principles: Governing Remote Work, Online Hearings and the Use of Social Media in Chilean Courts. JeDEM - EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 15(2), 118-147. Retrieved from https://jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/804.
Communication of the European Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions "European Interoperability Framework – Implementation Strategy". (2017). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52017DC0134.
Communication of the European Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions "Communication on the digitalisation of justice in the European Union". (2020). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=COM:2020:710:FIN.
Pacholska, M. (2022). AI and legal ethics: A European perspective. Israel Law Review, 55(3), 345-367. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/israel-law-review.
Derkach, V.H., Prokopovych-Tkachenko, Ye.D., & Rudenko, Ye.H. (2025). Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Court Process of Ukraine: Legal, Ethical and Procedural Aspects. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 3, 460-464. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2025-3/109.
European Court of Human Rights. (1979). Case of The Sunday Times v. The United Kingdom (Application No. 6538/74). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?itemid=001-57584.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Дмитро Лученко, Крістіна Пятигора

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


