International experience of implementing e-justice: best practices and challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2024.1(25).305796Keywords:
electronic justice, e-justice, classification, international experience, judiciaryAbstract
Abstract
The implementation of e-justice is an important aspect of the modernization of judicial systems around the world. Research and analysis of international experience allows to identify best practices and challenges faced by other countries during the implementation of electronic justice, which will help develop own strategy for reforming the judicial system or adapt them for Ukraine. That is why, the purpose of this article is to analyze the international experience of implementing electronic justice, classify countries according to the degree of development of e-justice, as well as identify best practices that can be applied in Ukraine. Conducting this research is extremely important and relevant, as it will reveal the level of implementation of electronic technologies in the judicial system of different countries of the world and determine the best strategies and practices, as well as factors that slow down this process. The research methodology was formed by a set of general scientific and special methods of cognition, namely, methods of dialectics, system analysis, comparative legal, classification and typology, formal logical, historical and empirical methods. The article analyzes in detail the experience of implementing e-justice in foreign countries, in particular in Estonia, Lithuania, Austria, Germany, Poland, Moldova, Greece, and Serbia. Attention is focused on the lack of a comprehensive approach to assessing the level of implementation of electronic justice in foreign countries in the scientific space, and the author's classification of countries according to the degree of implementation of electronic justice, which are divided into countries with a high, medium and low level of such implementation, is proposed. Based on the results of the research, it was concluded that countries with a high level of implementation of e-justice have a well-developed infrastructure and legal framework. Countries with an average level of e-justice implementation are actively working on the implementation of e-justice, but still have certain aspects for improvement. Conversely, low-implementation countries face a number of obstacles and need significant efforts to improve their judicial systems.
References
Каланча І. Міжнародний досвід використання електронного сегмента в кримінальній процесуальній діяльності суду. Національний юридичний журнал: теріорія і практика. 2015. № 6(16). С. 224-228.
Музичук О. М. Зарубіжний досвід організації діяльності судів та можливості його використання в Україні. Наше право. 2022. № 3. С. 227-233.
Sereda O., Mamnitskyi V., Kornieva P., Cherevatenko I. New Steps of Digitalisation of Civil Justice in Ukraine. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. 2024. Vol. 7, No. 1. P. 416-426.
Pyrohovska V., Holota N., Kolotilova T., Hreku A., Kroitor V. E-justice and the development of justice: strengths, challenges and prospects. Lex Humana. 2024. Vol. 16, No.1. P. 426-442.
Ahmed R.K., Muhammed K.H, Qadir A.O., Arif S.I., Lips S. A legal framework for digital transformation: a proposal based on a comparative case study. International Conference on Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective. 2021. Vol 12926. P. 115-128.
Saxena P. Technological Innovations in India’s Legal Sector for Access to Justice During and Post Pandemic. Law and Development Review. 2024.
Ahmed M. A., Kaya T., Karanfiller T. Evaluating E-court systems in regional governments in developing countries using technology acceptance model. Information Development. 2024.
Іванов А.В. Зарубіжний досвід інформаційно-правового забезпечення господарських процесуальних відносин. Соціальне право. 2020. № 1. С. 148-154.
Терещенко О.А. Зарубіжний досвід публічного адміністрування електронного урядування судової влади в Україні. Юридична наука. 2020. № 2(104). С. 334-341.
Пятигора К.В. Електронне правосуддя в адміністративному процесі: європейські стандарти та зарубіжний досвід. Теорія і практика правознавства. 2023. № 2(24). С. 39-58.
Gesetz zur Einführung der elektronischen Akte in Strafsachen und zur weiteren Förderung des elektronischen Rechtsverkehrs v 5.07.2017//BGBI.2017. I. Nr.45.S.2208.
Bundesrechtsanwaltsordnung v. 1.8.1959. // BGBI.1959. I. Nr.35. S.565; BGBI.2017. I. Nr.71. S.3618.
Bundesrechtsanwaltskammer: beA &ERV. URL: https://www.brak.de/anwaltschaft/bea-erv/ (Last accessed: 06.06.2024).
CMS: CMS expert guide to digital litigation in Poland. URL: https://cms.law/en/int/expert-guides/cms-expert-guide-to-digital-litigation/poland (Last accessed: 06.06.2024).
IPRE: Policy dialogue #Justice4Moldova on the implementation of the digital solution e-File system. URL: https://ipre.md/2024/02/08/dialog-de-politici-justitiepentrumoldova-privind-implementarea-solutiei-digitale-e-dosar-judiciar/?lang=en (Last accessed: 06.06.2024).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Крістіна Пятигора
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.