Peculiarities of practical application of offset of counter homogeneous requirements in the liquidation procedure

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2017.11.99018

Keywords:

counterclaims of homogeneous claims, bankruptcy, bankrupt, creditor, priority of satisfaction of creditors' claims, liquidation procedure

Abstract

The article is devoted to the peculiarities of practical application of uniform admission counter claims in the liquidation proceedings. The author of the essence, main content and implications of the liquidation proceedings in respect of an insolvent debtor. Analyzed the sequence of creditors' claims based on the principle of proportionality satisfaction of one stage and the full satisfaction of the previous turn.

The analysis of the category «redeemed requirements» and explored grounds for termination of obligations, including the way other than performance, including admission counter homogeneous requirements.

Singled out a number of requirements that might be counter admission of similar claims in the liquidation proceedings, and formulated and analyzed the claims of creditors repayment terms by transferring counter homogeneous claims in the liquidation proceedings, such as: the provision of appropriate consent of the creditor (creditors); and if it does not violate the property rights of other creditors.

In addition, the author provided the answer to the question whether admission requirements to be counter-homogeneous form of payment in the sale of property of the debtor (bankrupt).

Summarizing the author concludes, and that although the law stipulates repayment of creditors' claims by transferring counter homogeneous claims in the liquidation proceedings subject to a corresponding agreement of the creditor (creditors) and if it does not violate the property rights of other creditors, in practice this institute can undoubtedly be applied in the liquidation procedure only if the full satisfaction of all claims of bankruptcy creditors according to priority creditors' claims, and in the case of «implementation» illiquid residual masses «opposite» lender.

Author Biography

Тетяна Чубар, judge of the Cherkasy district administrative court

the applicant of Kyiv University of Law

of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,

References

Pro vidnovlennia platospromozhnosti borzhnyka abo vyznannia yoho bankrutom: Zakon Ukrainy vid 14.05.1992 r. № 2343-XII. (1992). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 31, art. 440.

Radziviluk V.V. (2005). Ponyatta ta harakterni oznaky likvidasii yak sudovoi prosedury bankrutstva. Sanasia ta bankrutstvo, 2, 89 [in Ukrainian].

Dzhun V.V. (2006). Institut nespromozhnosti: svitovuy dosvid rozvytku i osobluvosti stanovlennya v Ukraini. Kyiv: Yuridicheskaya praktika [in Ukrainian].

Polakov B.M. (2004). Zakonodavstvo Ukrainu pro bankrutstvo: teoria ta praktuka yogo zastosvannya. Kyiv: TOV «Vudavnutstvo «Yuruduchna dumka» [in Ukrainian].

Belov V.A. (2001). Denezhnue obazatelstva. Moscow: AO «Sentr UrInfoR» [in Russian].

Telukina M.V. (2001). Priminenie zacheta vstrechnuh odnorodnuh trebovaniy v otdelnuh vidah obasatelstv. Pravo i ekonomika, 6, 38 [in Russian].

Polakov B.M. (2014). Zakon Ukrainu «O vosstanovlenii platezhesposobnosti dolzhnika ili priznanii ego bankrotom»: Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy. (Vols. 1–2). Kiev: Logos [in Russian].

Pro otsinku maina, mainovykh prav ta profesiinu otsinochnu diialnist v Ukraini: Zakon Ukrainy vid 12.07.2001 r. № 2658-III. (2001). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 47, art. 251.

Telukina M.V. (2004). Osnovu konkursnogo prava. Moscow: Volters Kluver [in Russian].

Published

2017-06-14

Issue

Section

ADMINISTRATIVE AND FINANCIAL LAW