Application of limitation period to the requirements about confession invalid decisions of general meeting: analysis of judicial practice

Authors

  • В. І. Крат Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6595-1657

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2016.10.86674

Keywords:

invalidity, invalidity decisions of the general meeting, limitation period, begin to run of limitation period

Abstract

Problem setting. In a modern period often enough declare requirements about confession invalid decisions of the general meeting. The imperfection of the legislative adjusting invalid decisions of the general meeting stipulated both in a doctrine and in judicial practice far of problems related to limitation period (for example, proliferation/non-proliferation limitation period, his type and beginning to run).

Recent research and publications analysis. To research application of limitation period to the requirements about confession invalid decisions of the general meeting, in particular, such researchers applied as P. Gusakovs'kiy, O. Pecheniy, І. Spasibo-Fateeva.

Paper objective. Appropriate analysis of contemporary issues application of limitation period to the requirements about confession invalid decisions of general meeting actually unavailable. But, of course, there is a theoretical and utilitarian need, at a minimum, to proliferation/non-proliferation limitation period, his type and beginning to run.

Paper main body. The article is sanctified to research application of limitation period to the requirements about confession invalid decisions of the general meeting. In the article analyses application of limitation period to the requirements about confession invalid decisions of the general meeting in judicial practice through a prism: proliferation/non-proliferation limitation period, his type and beginning to run.

Conclusions of the research. It is offered to for providing definiteness in civil relations and stability of civil turnover to unify and set short limitation period for any requirements about confession invalid decisions of the general meeting.

Author Biography

В. І. Крат, Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого

канд. юрид. наук, доц.,
доцент кафедри цивільного права № 1

References

Hussakovskyj, P.N. (1915). Voprosy aktsyonernoho prava [Matters of joint-stock law]. Petrohrad: Senatskaia Typohrafyia [in Russian].

Pechenyj, O.P. (2006). Pidstavy zastosuvannia pozovnoi davnosti u korporatyvnykh pravovidnosynakh [Grounds of application of limitation of actions are in corporate legal relationships]. Ukrains'ke komertsijne pravo, 7, 86–93 [in Ukrainian].

Spasybo-Fatieievа І. (Ed.). (2007). Korporatyvne upravlinnia [Corporate management]. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Postanova Vyschoho hospodars'koho sudu Ukrainy vid 08.06.2004 u spravi No. 19/373v. vgsu.arbitr.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http://vgsu.arbitr.gov.ua/docs/28_569569.html [in Ukrainian].

Postanova Vyschoho hospodars'koho sudu Ukrainy vid 18.03.2008 u spravi No. 2/208. reyestr.court.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/1668837 [in Ukrainian].

Postanova Vyschoho hospodars'koho sudu Ukrainy vid 13.01.2009 u spravi No. 32/42pn. reyestr.court.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/2790769 [in Ukrainian].

Postanova Vyschoho hospodars'koho sudu Ukrainy vid 17.02.2011 u spravi No. 19/99(24/72). reyestr.court.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/ 14345108 [in Ukrainian].

Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 04.02.2015 u spravi No. 3-216hs14. reyestr.court.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/42708922 [in Ukrainian].

Postanova Plenumu Vyschoho hospodars'koho sudu Ukrainy «Pro deiaki pytannia praktyky vyrishennia sporiv, scho vynykaiut' z korporatyvnykh pravovidnosyn» vid 25.02.2016 No. 4. reyestr.court.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0004600-16 [in Ukrainian].

Postanova Plenumu Vyschoho hospodars'koho sudu Ukrainy «Pro deiaki pytannia praktyky zastosuvannia pozovnoi davnosti u vyrishenni hospodars'kykh sporiv» vid 29.05.2013 No. 10. reyestr.court.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0010600-13 [in Ukrainian].

Postanova Vyschoho hospodars'koho sudu Ukrainy vid 15.03.2016 u spravi No. 902/547/15. reyestr.court.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/56812748 [in Ukrainian].

Postanova Vyschoho hospodars'koho sudu Ukrainy vid 30.03.2016 u spravi No. 904/8773/15. reyestr.court.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/ 57000058 [in Ukrainian].

Postanova Vyschoho hospodars'koho sudu Ukrainy vid 02.03.2010 u spravi No. 16/40-K. reyestr.court.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/8801943 [in Ukrainian].

Postanova Vyschoho hospodars'koho sudu Ukrainy vid 14.07.2010 u spravi No. 12/102. reyestr.court.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/10611781 [in Ukrainian].

Postanova Vyschoho hospodars'koho sudu Ukrainy vid 11.01.2016 u spravi No. 924/182/15. reyestr.court.gov.ua. Retrieved from: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/54981705 [in Ukrainian].

How to Cite

Крат, В. І. (2016). Application of limitation period to the requirements about confession invalid decisions of general meeting: analysis of judicial practice. Theory and Practice of Jurisprudence, 2(10), 2. https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2016.10.86674

Issue

Section

Constitutional, civil and private international law