Modern information systems as technologies for optimizing the investigation of iatrogenic crimes

Authors

  • Victor Shevchuk Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Ukraine
  • Mariietta Kapustina Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2025.27.333561

Keywords:

iatrogenic crimes, information system, criminalistics support, forensic examination, criminalistic methodics, special knowledge, forensic innovations

Abstract

The relevance of this article lies in examining the prospects for implementing and utilizing an information system for recording and analyzing cases of improper medical care, with the aim of optimizing the investigation of iatrogenic crimes. The objective of this research is to demonstrate the necessity of developing and implementing such systems and to determine the practical possibilities of using information technologies to enhance the efficiency of investigating iatrogenic crimes. To achieve this goal, the study analyzed 20 judgments of the European Court of Human Rights concerning adverse outcomes in the provision of medical care; the World Health Organization's report on patient safety incident reporting systems; and the national Concept for the Development of a Strategy to Prevent Defects in the Provision of Medical Care. The research methodology includes the dialectical method, comparative legal method, structural-functional method, as well as sociological, analytical, statistical, and other methods. During the study, the key factors prompting the urgent need for effective mechanisms and innovative technological solutions to improve the investigation of iatrogenic crimes were identified and examined. These factors include the significant discrepancy between the number of cases of improper medical care and the number of criminal proceedings brought to court in this category of offenses.Difficulties in establishing a causal link between the actions (or inaction) of the person providing medical care and the adverse consequences in the form of harm to the patient’s health or their death; the latent nature of cases of improper medical care (defects in the provision of medical services). Generalized is the foreign experience of using and operating information systems for reporting adverse outcomes of medical care, and based on this, the advantages and capabilities of such systems are outlined. An analysis of the World Health Organization’s report on incident reporting systems related to patient safety has been carried out, the results of which indicate the existence of certain organizational problems in the implementation and use of such systems and proposed ways to address them. The results of this article include: proving the necessity of creating and implementing an information system for recording and analyzing cases of improper medical care; substantiating the position that the development and implementation of such a system in Ukraine will contribute to optimizing the investigation of iatrogenic crimes; arguing that the use of an information system for recording and analyzing cases of improper medical care will assist pre-trial investigation bodies in establishing the mechanism of iatrogenic crimes and its constituent elements; establishing a causal relationship between the actions (or inaction) of the person providing medical care and the adverse consequences in the form of harm to the patient’s health or their death; ensuring the prompt notification of law enforcement agencies about the occurrence of a case of improper medical care; simplifying the procedure for initiating criminal proceedings based on the facts of iatrogenic crimes; preventing obstruction in identifying cases of improper medical care by interested parties; and developing preventive recommendations for avoiding iatrogenic crimes. The provisions and recommendations proposed in this article are of scientific and practical value primarily for criminal justice professionals conducting pre-trial investigations of iatrogenic crimes, as well as for all participants in this process and individuals whose rights may be violated during the investigation. The issues discussed and conclusions drawn will also be useful for researchers, practicing lawyers, criminalistics experts, attorneys, and judges.

References

Shepitko, V. Yu., Avdeeva, G. K., Shevchuk, V. M. (2024). Innovative Methods and Digital Technologies in Forensics and Forensic Examination: Monograph. edited by V. Yu. Shepityko; National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, V. V. Stashis Scientific Research Institute for the Study of Crime Problems. Kharkiv: Pravo.

Zhuravel, V., Shepitko, V. (2017). Automated information systems as means of improving the investigation of murders. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 1(88), 163-172.

Birykov, V. (2012). Information and reference support for the investigation of crimes: concept, system, tasks. Law and Society, 2, 252-255.

Franchuk, V.V., Mikhaylichenko, B.V., Franchuk, M.V.(2020). Application of the decision tree method in forensic-medical practice in the analysis of «doctors proceedings». Sudebno-meditsinskaya ekspertiza. 63(1):9-14. https://doi.org/10.17116/sudmed202063011

Gray, B.M., Vandergrift, J.L., McCoy, R.G. (2021). Association between primary care physician diagnostic knowledge and death, hospitalisation and emergency department visits following an outpatient visit at risk for diagnostic error: a retrospective cohort study using medicare claims. BMJ Open 11: e041817. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041817 https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/11/4/e041817.full.pdf

Shevchuk, V., Kapustina, M., Zatenatskyi, D., Kostenko, M., & Kolesnikova, I. (2023). Criminalistic support of combating iatrogenic criminal offenses: Information system prospects. Social & Legal Studios, 6(4), 208-216. doi: 10.32518/sals4.2023.208. https://sls-journal.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/Social and Legal Studios_6_4_2023-208-216.pdf

Shevchuk, V., Vapniarchuk, V., Borysenko, I., Zatenatsky, D., Semenogov, V. (2022). Criminalistic methodics of crime investigation: Current problems and promising research areas. Revista Juridica Portucalense, 32, 320-341.

Zhuravel, V. A., Avdeeva, G. K., Sokolenko, M. O. (2020). Evidence-based medicine as a patient’s protection measure in judicial practice. Wiadomości Lekarskie, VOLUME LXXIII, ISSUE 12 PART 2, DECEMBER 2795-2803. https://wiadlek.pl/wp-content/uploads/archive/2020/WLek202012216.pdf

Birykov, V., Khakhanovskyi V., Bondar,V., Shalimov S. (2014). Information reference provision of criminal proceedings. Kyiv: Tsentr uchbovoyi literatury.

Bondar,V. (2015). Information and analytical support of criminalistic activity in the course of pre-trial investigation of criminal offenses related to terrorism. Uzhhorod National University Herald, 33, 137-141.

Chornous, Y. (2012). Theory and practice of criminalistic support of pretrial investigation in cases of crimes of an international nature. Kyiv: Skif.

Konovalova, V., Stratonov, V., & Savelieva, I. (2021). Biometric personal data and their use in the investigation of criminal offences. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 28(4), 289-300.

Pyrih, I. (2020). Information support of forensic expert activity. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 21, 179-193.

Shepitko, V., & Shepitko, M. (2021). The role of forensic science and forensic examination in international cooperation in the investigation of crimes. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 28 (1), 179-186.

Zhuravel, V. (2020). Crime mechanism as a category of criminalistics. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 27(3), 142-154.

Lukyanchikov, Е. (2005). Methodological principles of information provision of crime investigation. Kyiv: National Acad. internal affairs of Ukraine.

Shevchuk, V. M. (2020). Criminalistics: Traditions, Innovations, Prospects: Collection of Scientific Works. Kharkiv: Pravo.

Shevchuk, V. (2020). Methodological problems of the conceptual framework development for innovation studies in forensic science. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 27(2), 170-183.

Serdyuk, A., Skaletskyi, Yu., Yavorskyi, O. (2021). The concept of a strategy for preventing defects in the provision of medical care in the domestic health care system. Kyiv: Bogomolets National Medical University.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). Crossing the global quality chasm: Improving health care worldwide. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press.

Slawomirski L, Auraaen A, Klazinga N. (2018). The Economics of Patient Safety in Primary and Ambulatory Care: Flying blind. Paris: OECD.

Newman-Toker DE, Schaffer AC, Yu-Moe CW, Nassery N, Saber Tehrani AS, Clemens GD, Wang Z, Zhu Y, Fanai M, Siegal D. (2019). Serious misdiagnosis-related harms in malpractice claims: The "Big Three" - vascular events, infections, and cancers. Diagnosis (Berl). Aug 27;6(3):227-240. doi: 10.1515/dx-2019-0019. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2019-0019/html

Franchuk, V. V. (2019). Deficiencies in Professional Medical Practice: Forensic Medical and Clinical-Social Aspects: Monograph. Lviv: Magnolia 2006.

Case of Šilih v. Slovenia (Application no. 71463/01). European Court of Human Rights. Grand chamber. Strasbourg. 9 April 2009. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-92142

Cour européenne des Droits de l'Homme (32086/07) - Cour (Deuxième Section) - Arrêt (au principal et satisfaction équitable) - AFFAIRE ALTUĞ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE. URL: https://www.stradalex.com/fr/sl_src_publ_jur_int/document/cedh_32086-07

Causa G.N. E Altri c. Italia (Ricorso n. 43134/05). La Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo (seconda sezione). Strasburgo,1o dicembre 2009. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-149207

Eugenia Lazăr v. Romania (32146/05). Judgment 16.2.2010 [Section III]. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng/?i=002-1111

CASE OF MEHMET ŞENTÜRK AND BEKİR ŞENTÜRK v. TURKEY (Application no. 13423/09). STRASBOURG. 9 April 2013. European Court of Human Rights (Second Section). URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-118722

Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal [GC] - 56080/13. Judgment 19.12.2017 [GC]. Information Note on the Court’s case-law 213. December 2017. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=002-11777

Gray v. Germany - 49278/09. Judgment 22.5.2014 [Section V]. Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. 174. May 2014. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=002-9471

Case of open door and Dublin well woman v. Ireland. (Application no. 14234/88; 14235/88). European Court of Human Rights. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-57789

Case of Elberte v. Latvia. (Application no. 61243/08). Strasbourg. 13 January 2015. European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section). URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-150234

Petrova v. Latvia - 4605/05. Judgment 24.6.2014 [Section IV]. Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. 175. June 2014. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=002-9531

Eighth Forum on the Future of Patient Safety Management: Erpfendorf, Austria, 28-29 April 2005. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/341318

Snegiriev, Р. 2017. The National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine argues for the necessity national patient safety plan. Ukrainian medical journal, 1 (117), 9-13.

Patient safety incident reporting and learning systems: technical report and guidance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Licence. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240010338

World Alliance for Patient Safety. WHO draft guidelines for adverse event reporting and learning systems: from information to action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005 https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/69797/WHO-EIP-SPO-QPS-05.3-eng.pdf

Downloads

Published

2025-07-04

How to Cite

Shevchuk, V., & Kapustina, M. (2025). Modern information systems as technologies for optimizing the investigation of iatrogenic crimes. Theory and Practice of Jurisprudence, 1(27), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2025.27.333561

Issue

Section

Articles