Civic Entrepreneurs and "Ratio Legis" During Russia’s War in Ukraine: a Case Study of Digital Petitions in Latvia and Ukraine

Authors

  • Didzis Melkis University of Latvia, Latvia
  • Dmytro Luchenko Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2024.1(25).306839

Keywords:

policy entrepreneurs, civic entrepreneurs, electronic petitions, public initiatives, e-participation in legislation, ManaBalss.lv, ratio legis, war in Ukraine

Abstract

Civic initiatives that manifest themselves in the legitimate form of electronic petitions (initiatives) in different countries of the world are attracting more and more attention. This is especially true in times of social crisis. The war in Ukraine has become one of the most powerful factors influencing civic activity in both Ukraine and Latvia. A significant number of civic initiatives have emerged as a result of the war. The very content and focus of this activity has changed significantly under the influence of wartime challenges, which requires a separate scientific analysis. These circumstances have actualised the authors' research in this area. This article is the first attempt to study the experience of Latvia and Ukraine in the field of electronic petitions in the context of the war in Ukraine. The purpose of the article is to examine the role and influence of civil society actors on the justification of legislation, or ratio legis, in the legislative processes of Latvia and Ukraine during the crisis caused by the Russian war in Ukraine. To achieve this goal and solve the tasks stipulated by it, the following scientific methods were used: systematic, formal legal, comparative legal, analysis and synthesis, generalisation and critical analysis. The author has studied Ukrainian and Latvian legislation defining the procedures for publishing electronic petitions and collecting signatures in their support. The analysis shows that during the first two years of the war in Ukraine, the public initiative platform ManaBalss.lv (MyVoice) in Latvia received 165 proposals on wartime issues. Of these, 49 initiatives were published that met ManaBalss.lv's quality criteria. Among them, 10 reached the legally required threshold of signatures and were submitted to the parliament (Saeima) or the respective municipalities as collective submissions. Two of these collective submissions were implemented, in particular, an amendment to the legislation legally obliging employees of state institutions to be loyal to the Republic of Latvia and its Constitution was introduced. The study also examines the history of the 2019 collective submission to the Saeima demanding the demolition of the grandiose Soviet-era Victory Monument, which is protected by an international agreement. The study also includes the Ukrainian experience of civic activism, such as the initiative to legalise same-sex civil unions. It has acquired a new vector of relevance due to the war in Ukraine. This initiative was aimed at creating legal grounds for informing de facto spouses about the injury, captivity or death of the other partner, as well as exercising rights related to the death of a partner. The study revealed the targeted, persistent influence of individual and organised public figures or social entrepreneurs on the current state of legislation in the areas that have proven to be most sensitive to the challenges of war. The study of synergies, especially between civic and political entrepreneurs, aims to improve understanding of the mutually constructive work of policymakers and strengthen democracy. A properly conceptualised and practical experience-based mechanism of digital civic participation contributes to achieving this goal. This area is promising for further research.

References

Melkis, D. (2023). Sustainable Online Political Campaigning and Synergy Between Civic and Political Entrepreneurs: the Case of ManaBalss.lv. A panel paper for "Online Political Campaigning, Regulations and the Financing of Electoral Ads" in the 27th World Congress of Political Science, Buenos Aires, 15–19 July, 2023.

Schneider, M., Teske, P., Mintrom, M. (1995). Public Entrepreneurs: Agents for Change in American Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Knaggård, Å. (2015). The Multiple Streams Framework and the problem broker. European Journal of Political Research, 54, pp. 450-465.

Smiltēna, A. (2022). Cīņa par vienlīdzību: kā Latvija nonāca līdz vēlēšanu tiesībām sievietēm (III) (The Struggle for Equality: How Latvia Achieved Women's Suffrage). In: Jurista Vārds, 8. marts 2022 /Nr.10 (1224). Accessed at: https://ej.uz/ho4h.

Glushko, D., Lobanok, D. (2023). Civil rights in wartime: Legalizing same-sex unions in Ukraine. In: Eurozine, 31 March 2023. Accessed at: https://ej.uz/7tgm.

Sovenko, A. (2022). Легалізація одностатевих шлюбів (Legalization of same-sex marriages). In: Електронні петиції. Офіційне інтернет-представництво Президента України (Electronic petitions. Official internet representation of the President of Ukraine). Accessed at: https://ej.uz/f9o3.

Hall, P.A. (1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. In: Comparative Politics, Vol. 25, No. 3 (Apr., 1993), pp. 275-296.

Niesen, P. (2002). Anti-Extremism, Negative Republicanism, Civic Society: Three Paradigms for Banning Political Parties. In: German Law Journal, Volume 3, issue 7, pp. 1-32.

De Morree, P. (2016). The Concept of Militant Democracy. In: Rights and Wrongs under the ECHR. The prohibition of abuse of rights in Article 17 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Utrecht: Utrecht University.

Luchenko, D., Melkis, D. (2022). Електронні ініціативи як інструмент електронної демократії (Digital initiatives as an instrument of digital democracy). In: Права людини в умовах цифрової трансформації суспільства (Human rights in terms of the digital transformation of society. A monograph). Luchenka, D., ed. Kharkiv: The Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, pp. 88-108.

Saeima (2006). Rules of Procedure of the Saeima. In: Official webpage of the parliament of Latvia. Accessed at: https://ej.uz/quxj.

Law of Ukraine No. 393/96-ВР "On Citizens' Appeals". (October 2, 1996). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/393/96-вр.

Onyshchuk, O., Fedushko, S., Syerov, Y. (2020). Comparative analysis of E-democracy implementation in Ukraine and Switzerland. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. V. 2654, P. 629 – 642. (2019 International Workshop on Cyber Hygiene, CybHyg 2019. Kyiv 30 November).

EP (2023). Rules, procedures and practices of the right to petition parliaments - A fundamental right to a process. In: Official website of the European Parliament. Accessed at: https://ej.uz/245s.

Valtenbergs, V. (2022). From online participation to policy making: Exploring the success behind Latvian legislative crowdsourcing platform MyVoice. Engaging Citizens in Policy Making: e-Participation Practices in Europe, 1 January 2022. P. 120–135

Reshota, V., Burdin, V., Teremetskyi, V., Synchuk, S., Chopko, K., Burak, V. (2021). Electronic Petitions In European States And Ukraine Solving Social And Economic Problems. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues. V. 24, Special Issue 1, P. 1 – 9.

Khutkyy, D. 2019. E-Participation Waves: A Reflection on the Baltic and the Eastern European Cases. In: Proceedings of Ongoing Research, Practitioners, Posters, Workshops, and Projects of the International Conference EGOV-CeDEM-ePart 2019. Virkar, S. et al. (eds.). San Benedetto Del Tronto: IFIP, pp. 197-203.

Luchenko, D., The electronic petition as a way to influence the power available to every citizen: the role and prospects in Ukraine / Scientific Conference SOCIETY. HEALTH. WELFARE / 7th International Interdisciplinary SHS Web of Conferences. Volume 68 (2019). Riga, Latvia, October 10–12, 2018. Режим доступу: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196801019/

Interview 5. With the President of Latvia (2019–2023) H.E. Egils Levits.

Interview 4. With the chairperson of the Mandate, Ethics and Submissions Committee of the Saeima (23.11.2022– ).

Interview 3. With the chairperson of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Saeima (23.11.2022– ).

Interview 1. With the author of the initiative «Demolition of the Victory Monument».

Leadbeater, C., Goss, S. (1999). Civic entrepreneurship. London: Demos.

Constitution of Ukraine. (June 28, 1996). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254к/96-вр#Text.

Відповідь Президента України наелектронну петицію № 22/144562-еп «Легалізація одностатевих шлюбів», розміщену на вебсайті Офіційного інтернет-представництва Президента України 03 червня 2022 громадянкою А.А. Совенко, яку підтримали понад 25 тисяч громадян. (02 серпня 2022). Електронні петиції. https://petition.president.gov.ua/petition/144562.

Electronic petitions (Електронні петиції) (2024). In: Official online representation of the President of Ukraine (Офіційне інтернет-представництво Президента України). Accessed at: https://ej.uz/tork.

van Noordt, C., Misuraca, G. (2022). Artificial intelligence for the public sector: results of landscaping the use of AI in government across the European Union. Government Information Quarterly, 39 (3), art. no. 101714.

Fellmeth, A.X, Horwitz, M. (eds.) (2009). Guide to Latin in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Saeima (2022b). On the Prohibition of Exhibiting Objects Glorifying the Soviet and Nazi Regimes and the Dismantling Thereof in the Territory of the Republic of Latvia. In: Legal acts of the Republic of Latvia. Accessed at: https://ej.uz/vs5a.

Saeima (2022a). Saeima suspends bilateral agreement between Latvia and Russia on memorial buildings and monuments. In: Official webpage of the parliament of Latvia. Accessed at: https://ej.uz/q41d.

Interview 2. With the author of the initiatives «Prohibiting Individuals with Pro-Kremlin Sentiments from Holding Positions in State and Municipal Institutions», «Expulsion of Disloyal Individuals from Latvia and Revocation of Latvian Citizenship», and «Liberation from the Ideological Heritage of the Soviet Era – Monuments and Memorials».

Response 1. Written response by the National Security Commission of the Saeima.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-01

How to Cite

Melkis, D., & Luchenko, D. (2024). Civic Entrepreneurs and "Ratio Legis" During Russia’s War in Ukraine: a Case Study of Digital Petitions in Latvia and Ukraine. Theory and Practice of Jurisprudence, 1((25), 6–34. https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2024.1(25).306839

Issue

Section

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW