Some Issues of Determining Subject Matter Jurisdiction: the Experience of Ukraine and Germany

Authors

  • Anatolii Getman Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Ukraine
  • Mykola Kucheryavenko
  • Joerg Pudelka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2024.1(25).306609

Keywords:

delimitation of judicial jurisdiction, administrative jurisdiction, legal fact, access to justice

Abstract

The article examines the issues of delimitation of judicial jurisdictions in the categories of cases arising out of the challenges posed by martial law in Ukraine. The relevance of the study is stipulated by the growing controversy over the issues of delimitation of judicial jurisdictions in the categories of disputes which concern socially vulnerable groups of the population and are becoming more and more widespread. The purpose of the article is to study the issues of delimitation of judicial jurisdictions based on a comparative legal analysis of legislation and case law of Ukraine and Germany. In order to achieve this goal and solve the tasks stipulated by it, the following scientific methods were used: systematic, formal legal, comparative legal, analysis and synthesis, generalisation and critical analysis. The author examines domestic and German procedural legislation which defines the rules for delimitation of subject matter jurisdiction. The author highlights the issues of resolving cases related to establishing the fact of cohabitation of a woman and a man in the same family without marriage, which is necessary for further exercise of the person's right to receive a one-time financial assistance. The author examines the conditions and possibilities for a court to go beyond the established subject matter jurisdiction with a view to ensuring proper protection of a person's right in Germany.  The author proves that it is impossible to apply such an approach in Ukraine without appropriate amendments to the existing procedural acts. On this basis, the author critically analyses the case law of the Supreme Court and draws relevant conclusions.

References

Kucheriavenko, M.P. (2007). Tax Law Course. (Vols. 1-6). Special Part. Vol. II: Introduction to the Theory of Tax Law. Kharkiv: Legas.

Kolomoiets, T.O. (2009). Demarcation of Jurisdictional Powers Between Administrative and Commercial Courts: Individual Issues of Today. Bulletin of Zaporizhzhya National University, 1, 69-78.

Kolomoiets, T.O., & Liutikov, P.S. (2009). Problems of Legal Separation of Administrative and Economic Jurisdiction: Analysis of the Prerequisites for Their Occurrence and Possible Solutions. Law of Ukraine, 10, 175-181.

Kolpakov, V.K., & Hordieiev, V.V. (2011). Jurisdiction of Administrative Courts. (Book 1-2). Book 2. Kharkiv: Kharkiv Legal.

Paseniuk, O. (2009). Approaches to Improving Legislation and Practice in the Field of Demarcation of Types of Judicial Jurisdiction. Bulletin of the High Administrative Court, 1, 3-9.

Smokovych, M.I. (2022). Administration of Justice Under Martial Law: on the Issue of Legislative Changes. Scientific Bulletin of the Uzhhorod National University. Series: Law, 70, 450-455.

Peryshyn, O.V., & Zhuravel, V.A. et al. (2021). Legal Science of Ukraine: Current State, Challenges and Development Prospects. Kharkiv: Pravo.

Luchenko, D.V., & Polyakh, N.A. (2024). Application of the European Court of Human Rights Case Law in Administrative Proceedings of Ukraine. Kharkiv: Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University.

Decision of the ECtHR No. 37878/02 "Church of the village of Sosulivka v. Ukraine". (February 28, 2008). (2008). Official Gazette of Ukraine, 46, 63, art. 1504.

Ilnytskyi, O., & Boychenyk, I. (2022). Land Rights Disputes: Towards the Effective Protection of Rights, Freedoms, and Interest by the Administrative Courts of Ukraine. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 1(13), 25-50. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-5.1-a000097.

Krawczyk, A. (2022). The Administrative Judiciary Reforms in Young Democracy Countries (Comparative Legal Analysis). Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica, 98, 5-19. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.98.01

Decision of the BVerwG (Federal Administrative Court) No. 5C17.19 "Consideration by the Administrative Court of a Civil Law Claim (Bill from a Dentist) in the Context of a Public Law Claim for Damages Caused to the State". (February 26, 2021). Retrieved from https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=BVerwG&Datum=26.02.2021&Aktenzeichen=5%20C%2017.19.

Smokovych, M.I. (2012). Determination of Jurisdiction of Administrative Courts and Delimitation of Judicial Jurisdictions. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.

Gordieiev, V.V., & Bzova, L.H. (2021). Some Rules for Determining the Subject Jurisdiction of Administrative Courts. Law Review of Kyiv University of Law, 4, 85-89. https://doi.org/10.36695/2219-5521.4.2021.16.

Nehoda, O. (2017). Demarcation of Court Jurisdictions in Cases of Protection of the Rights and Legitimate Interests of the Child (According to the Materials of Court Practice). Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 12, 50-53.

Lawyers' Association "Lugovy, Dichko and Partners". (March 27, 2024). "Jurisdiction to Consider the Issues of Establishing the Fact of the Death of a Citizen of Ukraine During Military Service, in Particular, in Defence of the Motherland (Supreme Court in case No. 201/10689/23)". Protocol.UA. https://protocol.ua/ua/yurisdiktsiya_rozglyadu_pitan_shchodo_vstanovlennya_faktu_shcho_mae_yuridichne_znachennya_a_same_faktu_zagibeli_gromadyanina_ukraini_pid_chas_prohodgennya_viyskovoi_slugbi_i_vikonannya_obov_yazkiv_viyskovoi_slugbi_iz_zahistu_batkivshchini_sprava_201_10689_23/.

Pudelka, J. (2023). Administrative Law of Germany. Vol. 2: Administrative Procedural Law. Moscow: Infotropic Media.

Kopp/Schenke, VwGO – Commentary, § 40 Rn. 22ff. m.w.N.

Courts Constitution Act in the Revised Version Published on 9 May 1975 (Federal Law Gazette I p. 1077), as Last Amended by Art. 8 of the Act of 7 July 2021 (Federal Law Gazette I, p. 2363). Retrieved from https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_gvg/englisch_gvg.html.

Golovashevych, O., Kotenko, A., Krynytskyi, I., & Kucheryavenko, M. (2023). Comparative Characteristics of Approaches to Resolving Tax Disputes in Ukraine and Great Britain. Journal of Global Business and Technology, 19(2), 1-13.

Resolution No. 290/289/22 of the Civil Court of Cassation of the Supreme Court. (March 22, 2023). Retrieved from https://verdictum.ligazakon.net/document/109854993.

Law of Ukraine No. 2011-XII "On Social and Legal Protection of Servicemen and their Family Members". (December 20, 1991). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/card/2011-12.

Resolution of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court in case No. 320/948/18. (April 10, 2019) (proceedings No. 14-567цс18). Retrieved from https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/show/81574014.

European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14. Rome, 4.XI.1950. Retrieved from https://www.refworld.org/legal/agreements/coe/1950/en/18688.

Constitution of Ukraine. (June 26, 1996). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254к/96-вр#Text.

Marchenko, O., Pysarenko, N., & Balakarieva, I. (2022). An Examination of the Administrative Courts of Ukraine in the Context of Understanding the Concept of "a Court Established by Law". Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 2(14). 96-112. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-5.2-a000218.

Case of Belle v. France. (Application No. 23380/09). ECtHR Judgment of December 4, 1995. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-157670%22]}.

Matat, Y.І. (2016). The Right to a Fair Trial: the Practice of the European Court of Human Rights and its Implementation in Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of the Uzhhorod National University. Series: Law, 41(1), 31-36.

Review of the Judicial Practice of the Civil Court of Cassation as Part of the Supreme Court in cases of Disputes Arising Between Persons who Live in the Same Family, but are not Married. Retrieved from https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/media/new_folder_for_uploads/supreme/Oglyad_KCS_podr_1.pdf.

Law of Ukraine No. 2747-IV "Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine". (July 6, 2005). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-15#Text.

Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 975 "On the Approval of the Procedure for the Appointment and Payment of One-Time Cash Benefits in the Event of Death (Death), Disability or Partial Loss of Working Capacity Without Establishing the Disability of Military Personnel, Conscripts and Reservists Who are Called up for Training (or Inspection) and Special Meetings or for Military Service Reserves". (December 25, 2013). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/975-2013-%D0%BF#Text.

Resolution of the Supreme Court of 31.01.2024 in case No. 595/76/23 https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/116798849.

Resolution of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court case No. 287/167/18-ц. (January 30, 2020), Retrieved from https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/show/87454063.

Resolution of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court case No. 290/289/22-ц. (March 22, 2023). Retrieved from https://verdictum.ligazakon.net/document/109854993.

Kucheriavenko, M. (2009). Constitutional Principles of Competence of Administrative Courts: Whether Revision is Appropriate. Bulletin of the Higher Administrative Court of Ukraine, 1, 42.

Kucheriavenko, M. (2008). The Problem of Conflicts of Financial Legislation in Decisions of the Higher Administrative Court of Ukraine (Some Aspects of Methodology). Law of Ukraine, 9, 60-61.

Decision of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court case No. 595/76/2331. (January 31, 2024). Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/116798849.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-18

How to Cite

Getman, A., Kucheryavenko, M., & Pudelka, J. (2024). Some Issues of Determining Subject Matter Jurisdiction: the Experience of Ukraine and Germany. Theory and Practice of Jurisprudence, 1((25), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2024.1(25).306609

Issue

Section

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND INFORMATION