E-justice in Administrative Process: European Standards and Foreign Experience





e-justice, electronic administrative justice, information and telecommunication technologies, foreign experience, European standards


One of the key aspects of the development of electronic administrative justice in Ukraine is its compliance with European standards, which define important principles, methods, and recommendations aimed at ensuring the efficiency, accessibility, and quality of judicial activities in a digital environment. That is why the purpose of this article is to analyze European standards and foreign experience in the field of electronic administrative justice and the possibility of their implementation in national legislation. The conduct of this research is extremely important and relevant, as it will help to adapt the Ukrainian judicial system to international standards and norms. The methodological basis of the research is a set of general scientific and special methods of cognition, namely the methods of dialectics, comparative law, system-structural, formal-logical, etc. As a result of the analysis, it was concluded that significant attention should be paid to the protection of personal data, confidentiality, information security, as well as ensuring access to justice, impartiality, independence of judges, and justice. The article also highlights the experience of implementing information and telecommunications technologies in the system of administrative justice in such European Union member states as Estonia, Lithuania, and Austria, as well as Korea and China. It is noted that in these countries, electronic justice has become an important part of justice, and in view of this, the key aspects of their experience that can be useful for Ukraine are revealed. In addition, a comparative analysis of foreign and domestic experience in the functioning of electronic justice was carried out and the main reasons that slow down its development in Ukraine were identified. It has been proven that the involvement of advanced experience and best practices of foreign countries will significantly contribute to the successful implementation of electronic administrative justice in Ukraine. At the same time, it is important to take into account the unique context, capabilities, and needs of the national judicial system.


Contini, F., & Reiling, D. (2022). Double normalization: When procedural law is made digital. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 12(3), 654-688. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1305.

Law of Ukraine No. 228-IV "About the Concept of the Nationwide Program of Adaptation of the Legislation of Ukraine to the Legislation of the European Union". (November 21, 2002). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/228-15#Text.

Decree of the President of Ukraine No. 231/2021 "About the Strategy for the Development of the Justice System and Constitutional Judiciary for 2021-2023". (June 11, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/2312021-39137

Holubieva, N.Y. (2020). Electronic Justice: International Experience. Odesa: Phoenix.

Recommendation Rec (2001) 3 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to Member States on the Provision of Judicial and other Legal Services to Citizens Using the Latest Technologies (February 28, 2001). Retrieved from https://old.vkksu.gov.ua/userfiles/doc/perelik-dokumentiv/rek-2001-3.pdf.

Opinion No. 14 (2011) of the Consultative Council of European Judges to the attention of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the Information Technology Justice (November 7-9, 2011). Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/opinion-n-14-2011-on-justice-and-information-technologies-it-/16806a1fc0.

Strategy for e-Justice for 2019-2023 2019/C96/04 (March 13, 2019). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52019XG0313(01)&rid=7.

Onţanu, E.A. (2023). The Digitalisation of European Union Procedures: A New Impetus Following a Time of Prolonged Crisis. Law, Technology and Humans, 5(1), 93-110. https://doi.org/10.5204/lthj.2706.

Online Processing of Cases and e-Communication with Courts: Estonia. Retrieved from https://e-estonia.com/wp-content/uploads/2020mar-facts-a4-v04-e-justice.pdf.

Online Processing of Cases and e-Communication with Courts: Lithuania. Retrieved from https://e-justice.europa.eu/280/EN/online_processing_of_cases_and_ecommunication_with_courts?LITHUANIA&member=1.

Electronic Legal Transactions (the ERV System). Retrieved from https://www.oesterreich.gv.at/en/themen/dokumente_und_recht/elektronischer_rechtsverkehr_erv.html.

Supreme Court of Korea: History. Retrieved from https://eng.scourt.go.kr/eng/judiciary/eCourt/history.jsp.

Kadam, Tanmay. (July 16, 2022). China’s AI-Enabled "Smart Courts" to Recommend Laws & Draft Legal Docs; Judges to Take Consult AI Before Verdict. The EurAsian Times. Retrieved from https://www.eurasiantimes.com/chinas-ai-enabled-smart-court-to-recommend-laws-judges/.

Barabash, T., Humeniuk, I., Levytska, L., & Muza, O. (2022). Innovative Approaches to Judicial Modeling in the Context of E-Democracy: Prospects for Ukraine. Science and Innovation, 18(4), 120-130. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine18.04.120.

Mykolenko, O., Dryshliuk, V., Volkova, N., Prytuliak, V., & Verb, O. (2021). E-JUSTICE: Theoretical Principles and Problems of Realization of the Right to Judicial Protection in the Conditions of Digitalization. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 21(10), 295-301. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.10.42.

Maika, M. (2022). The Implementation of E-justice within the Framework of the Right to a Fair Trial in Ukraine: Problems and Prospects. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 3(15), 249-262. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-5.2-n000320.



How to Cite

Piatyhora, K. (2024). E-justice in Administrative Process: European Standards and Foreign Experience. Theory and Practice of Jurisprudence, 2(24), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2023.2.293064