Problematic Issues of Definition of Digital Forensics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2023.23.281734Keywords:
digital criminalistics; digital criminology; forensic digital examination, digital traces, cyberspace.Abstract
In the scientific literature and mass media, the terms “digital criminalistics”, “digital criminology”, “digital forensic examination” are used without distinction and sometimes even interchangeably. As they have a similar orientation and are closely related to each other, the question arises of how to differentiate these concepts and clarify their meaning. Scientific and technical progress in the field of crime counteraction, as well as general digitization of all spheres of society, are closely linked to the development of a new field of forensic knowledge: digital forensics and the use of digital evidence in the process of proving.
An important direction in criminology is the integration of knowledge and the introduction of cutting-edge, innovative scientific advancements aimed at addressing the challenges of combating crime.
Digital criminalistics is developing rapidly in Ukraine. Its progress is fueled by new challenges arising from Russian Federation aggression and the necessity to develop new remote electronic tools for the search, collection, recording, and analysis of criminal evidence. The advancement of digital criminology takes place according to three primary directions: 1) the formation of a separate scientific field within criminology; 2) application of specific expertise in working with digital evidence; 3) conduct of forensic examinations, including computer-technical examinations.
The Article Purpose is to analyze the views of scholars regarding the conception of digital criminalistics and its subject, as well as to classify the main directions in ensuring legality and combating crimes in this field. The research methods employed encompass general scientific theoretical methods, including analysis (which facilitated the differentiation of such concepts as “digital criminalistics”, “digital criminology”, etc., allowing to study them separately), synthesis (in the process of integrating various forensic concepts into a unified whole), abstraction (during transition from specific concepts related to certain types of forensic examinations to abstract forensic categories), and generalization (which enabled the transition from the analysis of individual areas of digital criminalistics to the understanding of a holistic concept) and explanation of individual concepts related to the field of digital criminalistics, as well as application of systematic, functional, and comparative methods to determine similarities and differences among specific concepts related to the research topic, aiming to identify common and distinct. Additionally, a systemic approach is used to study the concept of “digital criminalistics” as a holistic set of elements within a framework of relationships and connections.
References
Shevchuk, V. (2022). Modern Problems of Forensics in Conditions of War and Global Threats. Theory and Practice of Forensic Examination and Criminology, 28, 11-27. https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.03.2022.02.
Shevchuk, V. (2020). Modern Problems of Formation and Prospects for Researching the Concept of Criminalistic Innovation. Tendances Scientifiques de la Recherche Fondamentale et Appliquée: Collection de Papiers Scientifiques «ΛΌГOΣ», 2, 67-72. https://doi.org/10.36074/30.10.2020.v2.20.
Shepitko, V.Yu., Zhuravel, V.A., Konovalova, V.O. & al. (2019). Criminalistics. (Vols. 1-2). Vol. 1. V.Yu. Shepitko (Ed.). Kharkiv: Pravo.
Latysh, K.V. (2021). Forensic Analysis of Cyber Tools for Committing Crimes. Problems of Legality, 153, 165-172. https://doi.org/ 10.21564/2414-990X.153.230429.
Golovkin, B.M. (2020). The present and future of criminology. Problems of Legality, 149, 168-184. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.149.200724.
Stolitniy, A.V., & Kalancha, I.G. (2019). Formation of the Institute of "Electronic Evidence" in the Criminal Process of Ukraine. Problems of Legality, 146, 179-191. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.146.171218.
Kaplina, V.A., Raimundas, J., & Shumylo, M.Ye. (2019). Informational Theory of Evidence and the Problems of Using the Electronic Means of Proving in Criminal Procedure. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 26(2), 118-130.
Akhtyrska, N.M. (2016). To the Issue of Evidentiary Power of Cyber Information in the Aspectof International Cooperation During Criminal Proceedings. Scientific Bulletin of the Uzhhorod National University, 36(2), 123-125.
Bilousov, A.S. (2008). Forensic analysis of objects of computer crimes. PhD Thesis. Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.
Kotlyarevsky, O.I., & Kytsenko, D.M. (1998). Computer Information as Physical Evidence in Criminal Case. Information Technologies and Information Protection, 2, 70-79.
Krytska, I.O. (2016). Physical Evidence and Digital Information: Concepts and Relationships. Journal of the Kyiv University of Law, 1, 301-305.
Muradov, V.V. (2013). Electronic Evidence: Forensic Aspect of Use. Comparative-analytical Law, 3-2, 313-315.
Orlov, Yu.Yu., & Chernyavskyi, S.S. (2017). Electronic Display as a Source of Evidence in Criminal Proceedings. Legal Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 1(13), 12-22
Razmetaeva, Yu., & Razmetaev, S. (2021). Justice in the Era of Digital Technologies: Technological Solutions, Hidden Threats and Tempting Opportunities. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 2(10), 104-117. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-4.2-a000061.
Digital forensics. Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_forensics.
Rosenblatt, K.S. (1995). High-Technology Crime: Investigating Cases Involving Computers. San Jose: KSK Publications.
Meah, J. (August 19, 2022). Digital Forensics: The Ultimate Guide. Techopedia. Retrieved from https://www.techopedia.com/digital-forensics-the-ultimate-guide/2/34721.
Kabay, M.E. (2008). A Brief History of Computer Crime: An Introduction for Students. Norwich: School of Graduate Studies of Norwich University. Retrieved from http://www.mekabay.com/overviews/history.pdf.
Rouse, M. (August 24, 2022). Digital Forensics. Techopedia. Retrieved from https://www.techopedia.com/definition/27805/digital-forensics.
Mohanakrishnan, R. (July 18, 2022). What Is Digital Forensics? Meaning, Importance, and Types. Spiceworks.. Retrieved from https://www.spiceworks.com/it-security/cyber-risk-management/articles/what-is-digital-forensics/.
Kolodina, A.S., & Fedorova, T.S. (2022). Digital forensics: problems of theory and practice. Kyiv Journal of Law, 1, 176-180. https://doi.org/10.32782/klj/2022.1.27.
Prokopenko, S. (2017). Practice and Features of Conducting Computer and Technical Examinations. Materials of the IV All-Ukrainian Conference on Criminal Law and Procedure. Kyiv. Retrieved from https://uba.ua/documents/events/2017/20171109/Prokopenko.pdf.
Rouse, M. Op. cit.
Javed, A.R., Ahmed, W., Alazab, M., & Jalil, Z. (2022). A Comprehensive Survey on Computer Forensics: State-of-the-Art, Tools, Techniques, Challenges, and Future Directions. IEEE Access, 10, 11065-11089. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3142508.
Angelopoulou, O., Jones, A., Horsman, G., & Pourmoafi, S. (2022). A Study of the Data Remaining on Second-Hand Mobile Devices in Study of the Data Remaining on Second-Hand Mobile Devices in the UK. Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law Security and Law, 17(5). Retrieved from https://commons.erau.edu/jdfsl/vol17/iss2/5.
Kapur, A. (2021). Digital Forensics in Cloud Computing. International Journal of Computer Applications, 183(18), 10-13. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2021921524.
Chopade, R., & Pachghare, V.K. (2019). Ten Years of Critical Review on Database Forensics Research. Digital Investigation, 29, 180-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2019.04.001.
Mohanakrishnan, R. Op. cit.
Guo, H., & Hou, J. (2018). Review of the Accreditation of Digital Forensics in China. Forensic Sciences Research, 3(3), 194-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2018.1503526.[30] Leppänen, A., & Kankaanranta, T. (2017). Cybercrime Investigation in Finland. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 18(2), 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/14043858.2017.1385231.
What is Data Forensics? Digital Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.digitalguardian.com/dskb/data-forensics.
Criminology Vs. Criminalistics: What’s the Difference? BestAccreditedColleges. Retrieved from https://bestaccreditedcolleges.org/articles/criminology-vs-criminalistics-whats-the-difference.html.
Powell, A., Stratton, G., & Cameron, R. (1982). Digital Criminology: Crime and Justice in Digital Society. London: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315205786.
Digital Criminology. Purdue University. Retrieved from https://www.admissions.purdue.edu/majors/a-to-z/digital-criminology.php.
Vasileiadis, А. Digital criminology in solving cybercrime. hakin9. Retrieved from https://hakin9.org/digital-criminology-in-solving-cybercrime-by-anastasis-vasileiadis/.
Criminology (Cybercrime and Cybersecurity) MSc–2023 entry. University of Surrey. Retrieved from https://www.surrey.ac.uk/postgraduate/criminology-cybercrime-and-cybersecurity-msc.
Kolodina, A.S., & Fedorova, T.S. Op. cit.
Borysova, K.E., & Svitlichnyi, V.A. (November 25, 2022). Application of Digital Forensics. In Modern trends in the Development of Criminology and the Criminal Process under Martial Law: Materials of the Int. Scient. and Pract. Conf., pp. 83-84. Kharkiv: KhNUVS. Retrieved from https://dspace.univd.edu.ua/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/14869/Zastosuvannia%20tsyfrovoi%20kryminalistyky_Borysova_Svitlychnyi_2022.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Order of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine No. 53/5 "On the Approval of the Instructions on the Appointment and Conduct of Forensic Examinations and Expert Studies and Scientific and Methodological Recommendations on the Preparation and Appointment of Forensic Examinations and Expert Studies". (October 8, 1998). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0705-98#Text.
Law of Ukraine No. 4038-XII "On forensic examination" (February 25, 1994). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4038-12#Text.
Forensic Science: Types & Etymology. Study.Com. Retrieved from https://study.com/learn/lesson/what-is-forensic-science-forensic-science-types-etymology.html.
Forensic Science. Britannica.Com. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/science/forensic-science.
Order of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine No. 301/5 "On the Approval of the Regulation on the Central Expert Qualification Commission under the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine and the Certification of Judicial Experts". (March 3, 2015). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0249-15#Text.
Experts in Digital Forensics. Ukrforensic.Сom. Retrieved from https://www.ukrforensic.com/.
Aleksandrenko, O.V., & Zhenuntiy, V.I. (December 12, 2019). Innovations and Digital Technologies in Forensics and Forensics: Modern Opportunities and Problems of Application. Innovative Methods and Digital Technologies in Criminology, Forensic Examination and Legal Practice: International "Round Table" Materials. Kharkiv, 10-14.
Fedotov, N.N. (2007). Forensics – Computer Forensics. Moscow.
Computer forensics. Lviv: Faculty of Law of Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. Retrieved from https://law.lnu.edu.ua/course/digitalforensics.
Andrianova, T. (July 20, 2018). Forenzik – Must have Ukrainian Business. Nota Group. In Defense of Ukrainian Business. Retrieved from https://notagroup.com.ua/ru/news/forenzik-musthave-ukrainskogo-biznesa/.
Stulina, A. (2019). Applied Art. Legal Practice, 41. Retrieved from https://pravo.ua/articles/prikladnoe-iskusstvo/.
Dubinina, M.V., Syrtseva, S.V., & Yankovska, T.Yu. (2019). Forensics as a Method of Investigating Intra-Corporate Cases of Fraud. Market infrastructure, 38, 377-383. https://doi.org/10.32843/infrastruct38-59.
Chubenko, A.G., Loshytskyi, M.V., Pavlov, D.M., Bychkova, S.S., & Yunin, O.S. (2018). Compliance with Legislation and Internal Procedures (Compliance); Compliance. Terminological dictionary on issues of prevention and countermeasures against legalization (laundering) of proceeds obtained through crime, financing of terrorism, financing of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and corruption. Kyiv: Vaite.
ISO/IEC 27037:2012. Information Technology – Security Techniques – Guidelines for Identification, Collection, Acquisition and Preservation of Digital Evidence. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/44381.html.
The Berkeley Protocol for Conducting Investigations Using Open Digital Data. New York: United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.law.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Berkeley-Protocol-Ukrainian.pdf .
Mamedov, G. (June 8, 2022). Digital Forensics. How Did it Help Gather Evidence of the Buch Crimes? New Voice. Retrieved from https://nv.ua/opinion/voyna-v-ukraine-kak-cifrovaya-kriminalistika-razoblachaet-prestupleniya-rf-v-ukraine-novosti-ukrainy-50248411.html.
Mohanakrishnan, R. (July 18, 2022). What Is Digital Forensics? Meaning, Importance, and Types. Spiceworks. Retrieved from www.spiceworks.com/it-security/cyber-risk-management/articles/what-is-digital-forensics/.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Анатолій Тяпкін, Ігор Лущик
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
