Judicial Control over Executive Proceedings During Foreclosure on the Debtor's Property Held by other Persons
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2023.23.280937Keywords:
judicial control; executive proсcedings; debt collector and debtor; economic litigation; state (private) executor; appeal to the court; foreclosure on property held by other persons.Abstract
The article deals with the peculiarities of judicial control over the executive proceedings in economic proceedings during the foreclosure on property the debtor's property held by other persons. The attention is drawn to the execution of the specified actions in relation to property held by state-owned enterprises during martial law. Possible options for the implementation of judicial control in this area are considered, and attention is drawn to the peculiarities of departmental control over the implementation of executive actions during martial law. The circle of appropriate persons entitled to apply to the court with the relevant procedural document is analyzed. Depending on the nature of the economic legal personality of a legal entity, the issues of appropriateness of intervention in its activities for the purpose of compulsory debt collection by a private or state executor is considered. Due attention is also paid to the analysis of the conditions of the foreclosure on property the debtor's funds belonging to other persons. With this in mind, the indisputability of the debt is analyzed as a mandatory condition for foreclosure, as well as additional conditions for refusing to grant the lawsuit for the foreclosure on property on the above-mentioned funds. The study of judicial practice materials made it possible to ascertain the presence of other cases, except those specified in Part 2 of Article 336 of the Economical Procedure Code of Ukraine, in which the court refuses to grant the lawsuit. The analysis of the economic-procedural legal personality of the enterprise of the state when applying the foreclosure procedure on the debtor's funds, which should be in the said enterprise as accounts payable, was not left out of consideration.
References
Economic Procedural Code of Ukraine. (1992). Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 6, art. 56.
Decision of the Commercial Court of the Kharkiv Region dated April 12, 2023 on the case No. 922/2052/19. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/110175013.
Reis Junior, A.S., & Tivo Vieira, J. (2023). A (In)constitucionalidade da Execução Provisória da Pena nas Decisões Proferidas no Âmbito do Tribunal do Júri. Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública, [S. l.], 17(1), 24-37. https://doi.org/10.31060/rbsp.2023.v17.n1.1455.
Ovcharenko, O.M. (2022). Judicial Control over the Activities of Private Executors in Executive Proceedings: Conceptual Principles. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 10, 188-196. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2022-10/44.
Averianov, V.B., Horbunova, L.M., Komarov, V.V., Yemelianova, I.I., & Sibilov, D.M. (2005). Scientific and Practical Commentary to the Laws of Ukraine "On State Executive Service", "On Executive Proceedings". O.V. Lavrynovych (Ed.). Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.
Prowadzenie, P.S. et al. (2017). Egzekucja ma Być Przede Wszystkim Rzetelna i Skuteczna: [zapis debaty]. Dziennik Gazeta Prawna: Prawo, Biznes, Polityka, 8-9.
Lytvyn, Nataliia, Andrushchenko, Halyna, Zozulya, Yevhen, V., Nikanorova, Olena V., & Rusal, Lyudmila M. (2022). Enforcement of Court Decisions as a Social Guarantee of Protection of Citizens Rights and Freedoms. Prawo i Wiez, 39, 80-102.
Karaca, Halime. (2023). The Reasons Leading Businesses to Concordat and Solution Suggestions. In Fahri Özsungur et al. (Еds.). Bankruptcy and Reorganization in the Digital Business Era pp. 60-78. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5181-6.ch005.
Sibilov, D.M. (2021). Executive force of decisions of arbitration courts. Problems of Legality, 153, 38-48. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.153.225629.
Zabloudilová, Kateřina. (2022). Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards under Amended Czech Law and Recent Case Law. Pravnik, 3(161), 275-283.
Malinovska, N., & Yarkina, O. (2022). Filiuk "Public Order" as Grounds for Refusal in the Recognition and Enforcement of a Decision in International Commercial Arbitration: Ukrainian Realities and International Experience’. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 1(13), 154-164. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-5.1-n000096.
Küçüksu, Aysel. (June 2022, ngac013). Enforcing Rights Beyond Litigation: Mapping NGO Strategies in Monitoring ECtHR Judgement Implementation. Human Rights Law Review, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngac013.
Syahr, Z.H.A., Sally, N.U. & Albana, M.Z. (2023). The bailiff’s services in the electronic judicial era in Indonesia. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2023-0014.
Vilchyk, T.B. (2023). Uropean Standards of Executive Proceedings. Forum Prava, 75(2), 6-18. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7699510.
Uzelats, A. (2018). Towards European Rules of Civil Procedure: Rethinking Procedural Obligations. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University. Legal Sciences, 1 (106), 24-32.
Danylian, O.H., & Dzeban, O.P. (2023). Methodology of Scientific Research. 2nd ed. Kharkiv: Pravo.
Decision of the Economic Court of the Kharkiv Region dated May 10, 2023 in the case No. 922/2052/19. Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/110845495.
Sibilov, D.M. (2016). Legal Personality of Sub-Debtors in Enforcement Proceedings. Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series: Legal sciences, 2(1), 104-107.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Костянтин Гусаров
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
