Exploitation copyrights for a work created by an employee: trends, shortcomings and advantages of legal regulation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2023.23.278100

Keywords:

Keywords: author, a work created by an employee, the author is an employee, employer's copyright, moral rights of the author.

Abstract

The problems of legal protection of rights to works created by employees in connection with the performance of an employment contract are related to the definition of their legal regime and subjects of exploitation rights. The relevance of the study of these issues is due to the prevalence of legal conflicts between the author - employee and employer; the lack of an established practice of concluding agreements on the distribution of exploitation rights to a work between these entities; inconsistency of legislative provisions and repeated changes in legal regulation. When conducting a scientific study, the tasks were to analyze the process of transformation of the legal regime of works created by an employee under the legislation of Ukraine, to determine the advantages and disadvantages of legal regulation, to study the experience of regulating similar relations in European countries. The purpose of the work is reflected in the formulated conclusions regarding the optimal model of regulation of these relations in the context of balanced protection of the rights of their subjects. The study of the outlined relationships was carried out using a number of scientific methods, in particular, dialectical, formal-logical, analysis and synthesis, system-structural, formal-legal, comparative-legal, logical-legal, method of interpreting legal norms, prognostic, method of legal modeling, logical and legal method. Studying the issues of practical application of the provisions of the legislation, judicial  protection of the relevant rights, analysis of the positions of scientists and practitioners made it possible to draw a conclusion about the ineffectiveness of the model of regulation of joint copyrights of the employer and the employee. The current state of the studied relations, the experience of their regulation in European countries, the need to harmonize the law of Ukraine with the law of European countries prove the expediency of providing exploitation copyrights for works to the employer, as well as the possibility of including the copyright fee in the employee's salary. At any stage of the relationship, the employee and the employer retain the legal opportunity to enter into an agreement on the legal regime of works, the legal fate of exploitation  rights to them, payment of royalties for the performance of certain tasks, etc. In order to eliminate conflicts between legal norms, in accordance with the established principles of copyright, amendments to the legislative provisions are proposed. In particular, it is proposed to provide for the emergence (rather than the transfer) of exploitation copyrights from the employer, as the primary subject, from the moment of creation of the work. The need to exclude from the law the norm on the employer's right to instruct other employees to complete, supplement and change  works without the consent of their author is substantiated, since such actions can violate the author's moral right and harm his creative reputation. 

 

Author Biography

Natalia Yarkina, Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого

доцент кафедри цивільного права № 1

References

Law of Ukraine No. 435-IV "Civil Code of Ukraine". (January 16, 2003). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/en/435-15#Text.

Law of Ukraine No. 3792-XII "On Copyright And Related Rights". (December, 1993). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3792-12/ed20010816#Text.

Avramova, O. (2017). Realization of Property Rights to Service Objects of Intellectual Property. Small Notary Encyclopedia, 5(95), 135-141. Retrieved from http://yurradnik.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Avramova.pdf.

Radkevych, O. (2021). Right of Intellectuality of Ownership to Official Creation of Proprietary Work. Colloquium-journal, 24 (111), Część 2, 49-53. https://doi.org/10.24412/2520-6990-2021-24111-49-53.

Iakubivskyi, I.Ie. (2018). Acquisition, Implementation and Protection of Property Rights of Intellectual Property in Ukraine. Lviv: Ivan Franko National University of Lviv.

Sudakov, V. (2019). Resolution of Conflicts Regarding the Emergence of Exclusive Property Rights to an Object of Copyright Created by Order of the Employer (Service Work). Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property, 5, 30-38. https://doi.org/10.33731/52019.186314.

Yavorska, O. (2016). Protection of Intellectual Property Rights of Scientific and Pedagogical Workers: Achievements, Prospects, Problems. Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series Law, 63, 113-119.

Lipina, M. (November 25, 2021). Official Works: Changes in Legal Regulation. Legal Newspaper, 22(752), 36-37. Retrieved from https://yur-gazeta.com/dumka-eksperta/sluzhbovi-tvori-zmini-u-pravovomu-regulyuvanni.html.

Konovalenko, V. (October 14, 2021). Official Works: Chaos Supplants Law and Order. Mirror of the Week. Retrieved from https://zn.ua/ukr/internal/sluzhbovi-tvori-khaos-vitisnjaje-pravoporjadok.html.

Zhylinkova, O. (2018). Contractual Regulation of Intellectual Property Relations in the Field of Information Technologies. Law of Ukraine, 1, 137-145.

Pikhurets, O., Lytvyn, S., Miroshnykov, I., Mykolaiets, V., & Karashchuk, O. (2021). Copyright Regulation of Relations with Regard to Software: Current State and Perspectives. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 11(11), 161-168. https://doi.org/10.46338/ijetae1121_18.

Resolution of the Supreme Court of August 4, 2021 in the case No. 465/5652/15. Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/98869858.

Association agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the One Part, and Ukraine, of the other part (June 27, 2014). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/card/984_011.

Law of Ukraine No. 1667-IX "On stimulating the development of the digital economy in Ukraine" (July15, 2021). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1667-20#Text.

Law of Ukraine No. 2811-IX "On Copyright аnd Related Rights" (December 1, 2022). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2811-20#n855.

Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine No. 5 "On the Application of Legal Norms by Сourts in Cases of Protection of Copyright and Related Rights". (June 4, 2010). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0005700-10#Text.

Resolution of the Civil Court of Cassation of the Supreme Court of October 27, 2021 in the case No. 727/3072/18. Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/100816937.

Tomarov, I. (2018). Remuneration for the creation and use of an official work. Legal Shift: efficient legal content. (December 16, 2018). Retrieved from http://www.legalshift.com.ua/?p=1266.

Yakubivskyi, I.Y. (2020). Contract in Legal Regulation of Intellectual Property Relations. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 27(2), 64-76. https://doi.org/ 10.37635/jnalsu.27(2).2020.64-76.

Tokareva, V., Davydova, I., & Adamova, E. (2021). Legal Problems of the Use of Orphan Works in Digital Age. Juridical Tribune, 11(3), 452-471. https://doi.org/10.24818/TBJ/2021/11/3.03.

Myronenko, N.M., Shtefan, O.O., Kedia, Y.O., Derkach, O.B., & Semeniuk, K.O. (2021). Creative Approaches to the Creation of Contemporary art Objects and Features of their Legal Protection. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 368-382. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.45.

Shtefan, A. (2019). Freedom of Panorama: the EU Experience. European Journal of Legal Studies, 11 (2), 13-27. Retrieved from https://ejls.eui.eu/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/2019/05/2-EJLS-112-Shtefan.pdf.

Code de la propriété intellectuelle (version consolidée au 15 novembre 2019). Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/ru/text/540660.

Legge 22 aprile 1941, n. 633 sulla protezione del diritto d'autore e di altri diritti connessi al suo esercizio (aggiornata con le modifiche introdotte dal legge 21 settembre 2022, n. 142). Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/ru/text/585941.

Act on Copyright and Related Rights (Copyright Act, as amended up to Act of September 1, 2017). Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/ru/text/474263.

Wet van 23 september 1912, houdende nieuwe regeling van het auteursrecht (Auteurswet 1912, tekst geldend op: 01-09-2017). Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/ru/text/468397.

Ustawaz dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych (zmieniona ustawa z dnia 13 lutego 2020 r.). Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/ru/text/579753.

Directive 2009/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council "On the legal protection of computer programs". (April 23, 2009). Retrieved from https://document.vobu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/eu200924eu.pdf.

Dmytryshyn, V.S. (2022). Acquisition and Transfer of Rights to Service Objects of Intellectual Property. Bulletin of the National Technical University of Ukraine "Kyiv Polytechnic Institute". Political Science. Sociology. Law, 2(54), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.20535/2308-5053.2022.2(54).264398.

Shymon, S.I., & Lupalo, O.A. (2023). The Legal Regime of Official Work as an Object of Copyright: legislative novellas. Juridical Scientific and Electronic Journal, 1, 156-159. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2023-1/35.

Published

2024-01-08

How to Cite

Yarkina, N. (2024). Exploitation copyrights for a work created by an employee: trends, shortcomings and advantages of legal regulation. Theory and Practice of Jurisprudence, 1(23), 62–83. https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2023.23.278100

Issue

Section

CIVIL LAW