Experience of digital simulation of the Constitution system of Ukraine in the IDEF0 notation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2020.18.218892

Keywords:

Constitution of Ukraine, digital model of the Constitution of Ukraine, IDEF0 notation

Abstract

Object and process modeling allows to solve problems in systems. Therefore, developing a model of the Constitution of Ukraine using software is an urgent task for domestic jurisprudence.

Previously, the authors conducted a systematic analysis of the Ukrainian state system and proposed its cognitive model in IDEF0 notation. We used the same notation to model the crime system and its prevention system. Hutsa O.M., Obolentsev V.F., Demchenko O.V. developed a technology for modeling and detecting algorithmic errors in software regulatory acts.

The paper demonstrates the results of modeling the Constitution of Ukraine as a system in IDEF0 notation using CASE technologies (Computer Aided System Engineering - computer aided design) Microsoft Visio.

A two-tier model was built. The context diagram of the decomposition outlines the flows of the system interaction under study with the external environment: 1) input flows, which are converted into output flows (information and documents for the implementation of public authorities’ activity; staffing  resources for positions of civil servants); 2) incoming flows of governance (universal, equal and direct suffrage; the Declaration of Independence of Ukraine of August 24, 1991; the rule of law principles, independence, collegiality, transparency, validity and obligation of court decisions and conclusions; popular initiative; voter will); 3) input flows of enforcement mechanisms (people of Ukraine; state bodies); 4) outflows - the system results (human rights and freedoms and decent living conditions; civic consent in Ukraine; democratic, social, rule of law; balanced budget; monetary unit; State Flag of Ukraine, Grand National Emblem of Ukraine, National Anthem of Ukraine; civil servants appointed to the positions).

The second level of the model is a decomposition diagram that reflects the set of system elements (sections of the Constitution of Ukraine) and their interaction with the external environment and with each other

Author Biographies

Валерій Федорович Оболенцев, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminology and Criminal Executive Law

Олег Миколайович Гуца, Kharkov National University of Radio Electronics

candidate of technical sciences, associate professor, associate professor of the Department of Economic Cybernetics and Economic Security Management

Володимир Вікторович Єрьоменко, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Labor Law

References

Integration definition for function modeling (IDEF0). Draft Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 183, 1993, December 2. URL: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/FIPS/fipspub183.pdf.

Kopotun, I.M., Holovkin, B.M., Nalyvaiko, L.R. et al. (2019). Health-improvement competences formation technique in future police officers by means of personality-oriented approach to physical education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. Vol. 18, No. 11. Р. 205–217. URL: https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/1789/pdf

Obolentsev, V.F., Hutsa, О.М., Demchenko, О.В. (2019). Information technology of verification of algorithmic of medical regulations. Wiadomosci lekarskie. Vol. 72, issue 12 cz. 2. 24272433. URL: http://library.nlu.edu.ua/Biblioteka/sait/publ-3_2020.pdf.

Holovkin, B.M,, Lysodied, O.V. (2018). Pro naukovu diialnist kafedry kryminolohii ta kryminalno-vykonavchoho prava. Visnyk Asotsiatsii kryminalnoho prava Ukrainy, Vyp. 1 (10), 232–245 [in Ukrainian].

Hutsa, O.N. Analyz alhorytmychnosty protsedur v yurydycheskykh tekstakh yly Zakonov pysately, davaite porysuem… URL: http://finexpert.ru/view/analiz_algoritmichnosti_ protsedur_v_yuridicheskikh_tekstakh_ili_zakonov_pisateli_davayte_porisuem/942 [in Russian].

Dobrov, H.M. (1989). Nauka o nauke. Kyev: Naukova dumka [in Russian].

Yelchaninov. D.B. (2009). Systemolohichnyi pidkhid do analizu ta prohnozuvannia v derzhavnomu upravlinni. Stratehichni pryoritety, 2 (11), 82–87 [in Ukrainian].

Kulyk, K.D. (2019). Viktymolohichna kharakterystyka zhertv rozbeshchennia nepovnolitnikh v Ukraini. Porivnialno-analitychne pravo, 4, 343–348 [in Ukrainian].

Kutiepov, M.Iu. (2019). Problemni pytannia diialnosti ustanov vykonannia pokaran ta yikh vplyv na vypravlennia i resotsializatsiiu zasudzhenykh do pozbavlennia voli. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal, 5, 247–250 [in Ukrainian].

Lukashevych, S.Iu. (2018). Modeliuvannia zapobihannia zlochynnosti yak pidstava upravlinskykh rishen. Naukovyi visnyk publichnoho ta pryvatnoho prava, issue 4, vol. 2, 101105 [in Ukrainian].

Lukashevych, S.Iu. (2018). Modeliuvannia trendiv zlochynnosti. Visnyk Chernivetskoho fakultetu Natsionalnoho universytetu «Odeska yurydychna akademiia», 3, 103111 [in Ukrainian].

Liamets, V.I., Teviashev, A.D. (2004). Systemnyi analiz. Vstupnyi kurs. Kharkiv: KhNURE [in Ukrainian].

Metodі yssledovanyi і orhanyzatsyiі еksperymentov. (2002). K.P. Vlasov (Ed.). Kharkov: Humanytarnіі Tsentr [in Russian].

Novikov, O.V. (2019). Nehatyvni sotsialni naslidky zlochynnosti u sferi intelektualnoi vlasnosti. Zhurnal skhidnoievropeiskoho prava, 69, 177–184 [in Ukrainian].

Obolentsev, V.F. (2016). Bazovi zasady systemnoho analizu zlochynnosti ta viktymizatsii v Ukraini. Kharkiv: Yurait [in Ukrainian].

Obolentsev, V.F. (2016). Bazovi zasady systemnoho analizu zlochynnosti ta viktymizatsii v Ukraini. Kharkiv: Yurait [in Ukrainian].

Obolentsev, V.F. (2015). Bazovi zasady systemnoho analizu systemy zapobihannia zlochynnosti v Ukraini. Problemy zakonnosti Problems of Legality, issue 130, 155–161. doi: https: doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.130.53682 [in Ukrainian].

Obolentsev, V.F. (2019). Meta systemy derzhavy Ukrainy: zmist, kharakterystyky, znachennia dlia pravookhoronnoi diialnosti. Teoriia i praktyka pravoznavstvaTheory and Practice of Jurisprudence, issue 2 (16), 1112. doi: 10.21564/2225-6555.2019.16.180776 [in Ukrainian].

Obolentsev, V.F., Hutsa, O.N., Demchenko, O.B. (2019). Informatsiina tekhnolohiia perevirky alhorymichnosti normatyvnykh aktiv medychnoi sfery. Konstytutsiini zasady medychnoi reformy v Ukraini: materialy Medyko-pravovoho forumu (Kharkiv, 6 hrud. 2019 r.). Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Obolentsev, V.F., Yushchenko, O.H. (2019). Zactosuvannia metodiv shtuchnoho intelektu u yurysprudentsii. Protydiia orhanizovanii zlochynnosti i koruptsii: materialy KhIKh Vseukr. nauk. konf. z kryminolohii dlia studentiv, aspirantiv ta molodykh vchenykh (Kharkiv, 2 hrud. 2019 r.). A.P. Getman, B.M. Holovkin (Eds.). Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Pyvovarov, V.V., Klymchuk, Yu.M. (2018). Matematychni metody prohnozuvannia korporatyvnoi zlochynnosti. Pravo i suspilstvo, 2, part. 3, 160166 [in Ukrainian].

R 50.1.028-2001. Ynformatsyonnіe tekhnolohyy podderzhky zhyznennoho tsykla produktsyy. Metodolohyia funktsyonalnoho modelyrovanyia. Hosstandart Rossyy, 2000.URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200028629 [in Russian].

Smetanina, N.V. (2016). Naukovi pidkhody do teorii zlochynnosti u suchasnii ukrainskii kryminolohii. V.V. Holina (Ed.). Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Soroka, K.O. (2005). Osnovy teorii system i systemnoho analizu. Kharkiv: FOP Tymchenko [in Ukrainian].

Tavozhanskyi, O.V. (2018). Informatsiina bezpeka Ukrainy: stan pravovoho zabezpechennia v konteksti hlobalizatsiinykh protsesiv. Zhurnal skhidnoievropeiskoho prava, 56, 90105 [in Ukrainian].

Toda, M., Shuford, Е.Kh. (1969). Lohyka system: vvedenye v formalnuiu teoryiu strukturі. Yssledovanyia po obshchei teoryy system. Moscow: Prohress, 320383 [in Russian].

Uzlov, D.Yu., Strukov, V.M., Vlasov, O.M. et al. (2018). Prykladnyi kryminalnyi analiz na bazi informatsiino-analitychnoi systemy «RIKAS»: metodychni rekomendatsii shchodo analitychnoi diialnosti ta kryminalnoho analizu na bazi informatsiino-analitychnoi systemy «RIKAS». Kharkiv: Yurait [in Ukrainian].

Kholl, A.D., Feidzhyn, O.E. (1969). Opredelenye poniatyia systemі. Yssledovanyia po obshchei teoryy system. Moscow: Prohress, 252–283 [in Russian].

Shostko, O.Iu. (2018). Ctan i tendentsii vyiavlennia kryminalnykh koruptsiinykh pravoporushen v Ukraini. Problemy zakonnosti Problems of Legality, issue 141, 175–184. doi: 10.21564/2414-990x.141.133428 [in Ukrainian]

Issue

Section

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. STATE BUILDING