Judicial mechanisms for overcoming difficulties in resolving a dispute in the absence of a rule of law or inconsistency in its application

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2020.18.217648

Keywords:

legal mechanisms, analogy of the law, analogy of law, doctrine, interpretation, legal tools, norms of law

Abstract

The article considers the issues of the possibility of using such legal instruments as judicial mechanisms for overcoming difficulties in resolving disputes in the absence of an appropriate rule of law or inconsistency of its application. An attempt has been made to trace the tendency of courts to turn to analogy of law and analogy of law, as well as to broader interpretation and application of doctrines. It is concluded that the use of a variety of legal instruments provided by the Civil Code of Ukraine and judicial practice makes it possible to properly exercise and protect subjective civil rights. In the absence of full-fledged normative regulation, when considering cases, one should use such approaches as analogy of law and analogy of law, doctrine, interpretation. It is indicated that the proper interpretation of the norms of law is one of the conditions for their application in accordance with the needs of society, while giving rise to both the appropriate for the settlement of the problem, and legal means of their resolution. However, there is often a need for an analogy of law or analogy of law if the rules of law do not meet the conditions of formal certainty. It is shown that using a wide range of methods for solving problems arising from inappropriate or insufficient legal regulation, it is possible to achieve a useful legal effect. At the same time, it was noted that one should not overload the laws with unnecessary legal mechanisms, the judicial practice copes with this quite effectively

Author Biography

Ольга Анатоліївна Сурженко, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

Phd іn Law, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Сivil Law Department № 1

References

Dovhert, A.S. (2013). Analohiia v Tsyvilnomu kodeksi ta sudovii praktytsi Ukrainy. Pryvatne pravo, 1, 159–163 [in Ukrainian].

Klim, S.I. (2012). Analohiia zakonu u tsyvilnomu pravi Ukrainy. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Odesa [in Ukrainian].

Pohribnyi, S. (2010). Analohiia zakonu ta analohiia prava yak zasoby rehuliuvannia dohovirnykh tsyvilnykh vidnosyn. Teoriia i praktyka intelektualnoi vlasnosti, 5, 14–21 [in Ukrainian].

Pechenyi, O. (2007). Deiaki problemy zastosuvannia analohii v tsyvilnomu pravi. Visnyk Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy, 2 (49), 108–119 [in Ukrainian].

Kroitor, V.A. (2016). Usunennia prohalyn u tsyvilnomu pravi za dopomohoiu analohii prava, analohii zakonu ta mizhhaluzevoi analohii. Forum prava, 3, 159–166 [in Ukrainian].

Zavalniuk, S.V. (2018). Analohiia prava za tsyvilnym zakonodavstvom Ukrainy. Odesa: Yuryd. lit. [in Ukrainian].

Kostruba, A.V. (2012). Analohiia prava ta zakonu yak yurydychna fiktsiia i «sposib ozdorovlennia» mekhanizmu pravo prypynennia. Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava, 3, 184–189 [in Ukrainian].

Protokol do Konventsii pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_535#Text.

Postanova kolehii suddiv Pershoi sudovoi palaty Kasatsiinoho tsyvilnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 23.01.2019 r. sprava № 686/9954/17. (2019). URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/79472281.

Postanova Plenumu Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 06.11.2009 r. № 9 «Pro sudovu praktyku rozghliadu tsyvilnykh sprav pro vyznannia pravochyniv nediisnymy». (2009). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0009700-09?find=1&text=fiktyvn#w1_1.

Postanova Plenumu Vyshchoho hospodarskoho sudu Ukrainy vid 29.05.2013 r. № 11 «Pro deiaki pytannia vyznannia pravochyniv (hospodarskykh dohovoriv) nediisnymy». (2013). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0011600-13?find=1&text=fiktyvn#w1_1.

Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu u skladi kolehii suddiv Druhoi sudovoi palaty Kasatsiinoho tsyvilnoho sudu vid 06.03.2019 r. v spravi № 317/3272/16-ts (provadzhennia № 61-156sv17). (2019). URL: https://protocol.ua/ua/postanova_ktss_vp_vid_06_03_2019_roku _u_spravi_317_3272_16_ts/.

Pro vykonannia rishen ta zastosuvannia praktyky Yevropeiskoho sudu prav liudyny : Zakon Ukrainy vid 23.02.2006 r. (2006). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3477-15#Text.

Sabodash, R. Pronyknennia pid korporatyvnu vual: praktyka Verkhovnoho Sudu ta Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny (porivnialnyi analiz). URL: https://www.academia.edu/42127142/ [in Ukrainian].

Postanova Kasatsiinoho hospodarskoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 06.03.2018 r. po spravi № 907/167/17. URL: https://verdictum.ligazakon.net/document/ 72645204

Published

2020-12-14

Issue

Section

Civil law and civil procedure