On the issue of improving the disposition of Article 402 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (Disobedience)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2020.17.206390

Keywords:

disobedience, military man, commander, military organization, order

Abstract

The article analyzes some signs of the objective side of disobedience, namely the method of committing a crime, its consequences, as well as qualifying and especially qualifying signs.

It is proved that the principle of unity of command of commanders permeates all spheres of military activity, allows the military organization of the state to ensure the defense capability of Ukraine. Disobedience is the crime that destroys military-service relations between the commander (chief) and subordinate, directly affects the combat effectiveness of a military unit and, therefore, has an increased degree of public danger.

In the scientific literature there are views proving the increased public danger of an open refusal to comply with the order of the commander (chief), motivating this thesis that a soldier shows a greater degree of determination to violate his duties, a greater willpower, which has already passed a period of hesitation. According to the author, an open and public refusal to comply with the order of the chief is more socially dangerous than cases of other intentional failure to comply with the order. Disobedience not only threatens the combat effectiveness of a military unit, but also significantly affects the state of military law and order and discipline.

We believe that the court in all cases of criminal proceedings on the fact of disobedience or other intentional non-execution of the order, pointing out the grave consequences, should reason its point of view.

It is concluded that the disposition of Article 402 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine requires some improvements that are relevant to modern times. These improvements will help strengthen military discipline and the rule of law.

Submitted suggestions by «delega ferende» that will correct significant legislative errors

Author Biography

Юрій Вадимович Шапошніков, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

Post-graduate Student of the Department of Criminal Law of

References

Zlochyny proty vstanovlenoho poriadku nesennia viiskovoi sluzhby (viiskovi zlochyny). M.I. Panov (Ed.). (2011). Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Bessonov, D.D. (1911). Osobennaya chast’ voyenno-ugolovnogo prava: konspekt lektsiy, chit. v Aleksandr. voyen.-yurid. akad. v1910 g. Otd. 1. Sankt-Peterburg: Izd. shtabs-kap. Gnilosarov i poruchik Lyubimov [in Russian].

Chkhikvadze, V.M. (1948). Sovetskoye voyenno-ugolovnoye pravo. Moscow: Yurid. izd-vo Minyusta SSSR [in Russian].

Panov, M.I., Kharytonov, S.O. (2019). Suspilʹna nebezpechnistʹ diyannya – fundamentalʹna oznaka ponyattya “kryminalʹne pravoporushennya”. Yurydychnyy visnyk Ukrayiny, 16 [in Ukrainian].

Zakon ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za voinskiye prestupleniya: kommentariy. A.G. Gorniy (Ed.). (1986). Moscow: Yurid. lit. [in Russian].

Kharytonov, S.O. (2019). Viysʹkovi zlochyny: ponyattya, systema ta problemy kvalifikatsiyi. Doctor’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Pro pravovyi rezhym voiennoho stanu: Zakon Ukrainy vid 12.05.2015 r. № 389-VIII. (2015). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 28, art. 250.

Pro oboronu Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 06.12.1991 r. № 1932-XII. (1992). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 9, art. 106.

Panov, N.I. (2016). Otsenochnye ponyatyya: metodolohycheskye obʺekty yssledovanyya y prymenenyya v uholovnom prave. Visnyk Asotsiatsiyi kryminalʹnoho prava Ukrayiny. URL: http://nauka.nlu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/01_Panov.pdf [in Russian].

Kharytonov, S.O. (2017). Naslidky viiskovykh zlochyniv za kryminalnym zakonodavstvom Ukrainy. Visegrad journal on human right, 3, 203–208 [in Ukrainian].

Komandiru o voyenno-ugolovnom zakonodatel’stve. A.G. Gorniy (Ed.). (1985). Moscow: Voyenizdat [in Russian].

Orlovsʹkyy, R.S. (2019). Teoretychni ta metodolohichni problemy instytutu spivuchasti u kryminalʹnomu pravi Ukrayiny. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Kvasha. O.O. (2013). Spivuchast u zlochyni: struktura ta vidpovidalnist. Luhansk: RRV LDUVS im. E.O. Didorenka [in Ukrainian].

Vladimirov, V.A., Lyapunov, Yu.I. (1986). Otvetstvennost’ za korystnyye posyagatel’stva na sotsialisticheskuyu sobstvennost’. Moscow: Yurid. lit. [in Russian].

Orlovskyy, R.S. (2014). O ponyatyy predvarytelʹnoho s·hovora. Pravove zabezpechennya polityky derzhavy na suchasnomu etapi yiyi rozvytku: Proceedings of the International Conference. Donetsʹk [in Russian]

How to Cite

Шапошніков, Ю. В. (2020). On the issue of improving the disposition of Article 402 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (Disobedience). Theory and Practice of Jurisprudence, 1(17), 5. https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2020.17.206390

Issue

Section

CRIMINAL LAW, CRIMINOLOGY AND CRIMINALISTICS