Economic and procedural status of the Prosecutor in conditions of domestic legislation recodification

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2019.16.186103

Keywords:

recodification, procedural legal capacity, prosecutor’s participation, procedural relations

Abstract

The article highlights the changes in the procedural position of the prosecutor as a subject of economic and procedural relations. At the same time, attention is paid to the causes and conditions of recodification as a form of systematization of economic procedural legislation. It is noted that the general conditions of recodification are connected with the necessity to amend, among other things, of the procedural and legal status of the subjects of economic and procedural relations.  In addition, the issues of correlation of the prosecutor’s participation in the economic process with the principle of proportionality, the change of the purpose of the prosecutor’s participation in the stated proceedings are considered. Besides, the subject of the research in the article includes the manifestation of the prosecutor’s economic procedural legal capacity in various forms of his participation in the economic procedure: appeal to the court, entry into a court case; the specifics of the appeal against the decision by the prosecutor and the restrictions imposed by the legislator in connection therewith.

As a prerequisite for the participation of the said entity in the economic proceedings, it is argued that there is a need for the legislative fixing of the obligatory registration of the official e-mail address in a single judicial information and telecommunication system

Author Biography

Лев Володимирович Волевський, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

Роstgraduate Student, Department of Economic Law

References

Gusarov, K.V. (2000). Problemyi grazhdanskoy protsessualnoy pravosub’ektnosti. Doctor’s thesis. Kharkov [in Russian].

Dovhert, A.S. (2019). Rekodyfikatsiia Tsyvilnoho kodeksu Ukrainy: osnovni chynnyky i peredumovy dlia startu. Pravo Ukrainy, 1, 27–41 [in Ukrainian].

Izarova, I.O. (2016). Teoretychni i praktychni zasady harmonizatsii tsyvilnoho protsesu Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu ta Ukrainy. Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Gusarov, K.V. (2017). Vplyv konstytutsiinoi skarhy na ostatochnist sudovoho rishennia ta vycherpannia natsionalnykh zasobiv yurydychnoho zakhystu u tsyvilnomu protsesi. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy, 1 (88), 120–130 [in Ukrainian].

Barakhtian, N.V. (2014). Poniattia ta formy derzhavnoho kontroliu u sferi hospodarskoi diialnosti. Pravo i suspilstvo, 2, 69–75 [in Ukrainian].

Gusarov, K.V. (1998). Problemyi uchastiya prokurora v grazhdanskom protsesse // Problemy orhanizatsii prokuratury y optymizatsii yii diialnosti v suchasnykh umovakh. Kharkiv: IPK Heneralnoi prokuratury Ukrainy, 229–234 [in Ukrainian].

Komarov, V.V., Bigun, V.A., Barankova, V.V. (2002). Problemyi nauki grazhdanskogo protsessualnogo prava. V.V. Komarov (Ed.). Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Rudenko, M.V. (2006). Predstavnytstvo prokurora u hospodarskomu protsesi: deiaki teoretychni ta praktychni aspekty. Vdoskonalennia sudoustroiu ta hospodarskoho sudochynstva: problemy i perspektyvy: materialy nauk.-prakt. konf. (Donetsk, 12–13 kvit. 2006 r.). Donetsk, 442–446 [in Ukrainian].

Tatsii, V.Ya. (1999). Prokuratura v systemi podilu vlad. Visnyk prokuratury, 2, 27–32 [in Ukrainian].

Ukhvala Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 19 lypnia 2018 r. u spravi № 822/1169/17. URL: https://verdictum.ligazakon.net/document/75424056.

Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 20 veresnia 2018 r. u spravi № 924/1237/17. URL: resurs: http://search.ligazakon.ua/l_doc2.nsf/link1/VS181800.html.

Pravovyi status prokurora u hospodarskomu sudi: ohliad sudovoi praktyky KHS VS. URL: https://sud.ua/ru/news/sud-info/138765-pravoviy-status-prokurora-u-gospodarskomu-sudi-oglyad-sudovoyi-praktiki-kgs-vs/

How to Cite

Волевський, Л. В. (2019). Economic and procedural status of the Prosecutor in conditions of domestic legislation recodification. Theory and Practice of Jurisprudence, 2(16), 11. https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2019.16.186103

Issue

Section

ECONOMIC AND CRIMINAL LAW