The legal status of the prosecutor in modern civil proceedure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2019.16.186036Keywords:
civil proceedings, the status of the Prosecutor in civil proceedings, participants in civil proceedings, proxyship in civil proceedingsAbstract
The constitutional reform in the sphere of justice and further reform of civil procedure legislation are aimed at improving the efficiency of civil proceedings and bringing it into line with international standards of fair justice, which resulted in significant changes in the legislative regulation of classical civil procedures, as well as the introduction of new institutions of civil procedure law.
The article presents a detailed analysis of modern legislation, which regulates the issue of the legal status of the Prosecutor in civil proceedings, the provisions of judicial practice and scientific doctrine are studied thoroughly. The author focuses on the novelties of the domestic legislation governing the legal status of the prosecutor in the civil process, in particular, the author analyzes the provisions of both special and general legislation with the argument of negative or positive changes. The basic rights and obligations of the prosecutor are determined in accordance with the latest civil procedural law.
The legal status of the Prosecutor in civil proceedings is determined by the relations of functional procedural proxyship, when the Prosecutor may stand for the state or an individual, subject to the preliminary confirmation by the court of the existence of reasonable grounds for the participation of the Prosecutor in civil proceedings. The reform of the judicial system in Ukraine provides for a narrowing of the powers of the Prosecutor’s office to participate in civil proceedings and is aimed at preventing the formation of a privileged procedural status of the Prosecutor in civil proceedings. Consequently, the narrowing of the legal status of the Prosecutor in civil proceedings corresponds to the principle of dispositivity in civil proceedingsReferences
Stefanchuk, M.M. (2015). Napriamy vdoskonalennia protsesualnoho statusu prokurora yak subiekta realizatsii funktsii predstavnytstva interesiv hromadianyna abo derzhavy v sudi. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu, 2, 115–121 [in Ukrainian]
Pro prokuraturu: Zakon Ukrainy vid 14.10.2014 r. № 1697-VII. (2015) Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy – Supreme Council of Ukraine, 2–3, art. 12 [in Ukrainian]
Tsyvilnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy: naukovo-praktychnyi komentar. M.M. Yasynok (Ed.). (2018). Kyiv: Alerta [in Ukrainian]
Okrema dumka Suddi Kasatsiinoho tsyvilnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu Krata V. I. vid 06.06.2018 r. u spravi № 607/1557/17, provadzhennia № 61-17407sv18, YeDRSRU № 74659804. URL: https://youcontrol.com.ua/catalog/court-document/84355257/.
Bezkrovnyi, Ye. (2016). Predstavnytstvo prokurorom interesiv hromadianyna abo derzhavy u sudi v suchasnykh umovakh. Naukovyi chasopys Natsionalnoi akademii prokuratury Ukrainy – Scientific journal of the National Academy of Public Prosecutor of Ukraine, 2, ch. 1, 28–36. URL: http://www.chasopysnapu.gp.gov.ua/ chasopys/ua/pdf/10-2016/01/bezkrovnyj.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Uchast prokurora v sudi na botsi odniiei zi storin ye obstavynoiu, shcho mozhe vplyvaty na dotrymannia pryntsypu rivnosti storin URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/75424056 [in Ukrainian].
Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 08.04.1999 r. u spravi № 1-1/99. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v003p710-99.
Sprava «Yanholenko proty Ukrainy» (Zaiava № 14077/05) Yevropeiskyi sud z prav liudyny, Mizhnarodni sudy; Rishennia, Sprava vid 10.12.2009 r. URL: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/974_533 [in Ukrainian]
Pro vykonavche provadzhennia: Zakon Ukrainy vid 02.06.2016 r. № 1404-VIII. URL: http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1404-19.
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny «Fereira Alvesh proty Portuhalii» № 25053/05 vid 21.06.2007 r. URL: http://docs.pravo.ru/document/view/15794600/12862205/
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Theory and practice of jurisprudence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.