Independence of judicial power as the constitutional value and principle of the constitutional system of Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2018.13.131289Keywords:
the constitutional values, the principles of constitutional system, the judiciary independence as a principle of constitutional system, the judiciary independence guarantee mechanismAbstract
In the article there is comprehensive analysis of politico-legal nature and social value of independent judiciary power as one of the main modern constitutionalism ideas, researched evolution of it social understanding and acceptance. Clarified that expected result of long historical process of science researches and philosophic-legal discussions regarding significant sense of independent judiciary existence for democratic and legal-state was common confession and formal legal assignment of that main idea in first left-wing democratic constitutions.
At the same time explored that idea of judiciary independence as basic constitutional principle nowadays directly assigned only in Constitutions of France,Switzerland, in Constitutional Act of Canada and some other Constitutions. More often on the Constitutional level assigned norms which guarantees independence and inviolability of the judges (Spain,Germany,Italy,Greece, Japan etc.).
In article proved that Ukraine being as a legal-state impossible without real independent and impartial judiciary, which is a guarantee of functioning other power institutes in frames of their powers stated by the Constitution and laws of Ukraine and final method of solution of any legal as of competent disputes between other power institutes. It made justified conclusion that political-legal idea of judiciary independence be due avowed values of Constitutional level, which absolute supported by Ukrainian society and found its systematic although mediocre legal-norm displaying in variety of articles in Constitution of Ukraine. According to the most importance and identified meaning of real judiciary independence for Ukraine functionality as the democracy and legal-state, for providing the rule of law and for primarily – effective human rights and freedoms protection, the judiciary independence belong to basic Constitutional principles which in total are basis for Constitutional System of Ukraine US style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language: UK;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA'>abuse its constitutionally determined powers and, as a result, will infringe the Fundamental Law of Ukraine, in particular, its second section of article 19, according to which bodies of public power and their officials are obliged to act only on the grounds, within the limits of authority, and in the manner envisaged by the Constitution and the laws of Ukraine. However, the legislator is still able to prevent appearance of the above situation by necessary amendments to the Law of Ukraine «On the Constitutional Court of Ukraine»References
Chlevyk, O.V. (2016). Svoboda yak katehoriia konstytutsiinoho prava. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Pohrebniak, S. (2009). Zakriplennia osnovopolozhnykh pryntsypiv prava v Konstytutsii Ukrainy. Visnyk Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy – Herald of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 4 (59), 31–39 [in Ukrainian].
Venislavskyi, F.V. (1998). Vzaiemodiia hilok derzhavnoi vlady yak pryntsyp osnov konstytutsiinoho ladu Ukrainy. Pravo Ukrainy – Law of Ukraine, 1, 34-38 [in Ukrainian].
Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 11 lypnia 1997 r. № 3-zp/1997 (sprava shchodo konstytutsiinosti tlumachennia Verkhovnoiu Radoiu Ukrainy statti 98 Konstytutsii Ukrainy). (1997). Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy – Official Gazette of Ukraine, 29, 85–88.
Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 14 hrudnia 1999 roku № 10-pp/1999 (sprava pro zastosuvannia ukrainskoi movy). (2000). Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy – Official Gazette of Ukraine, 4, art. 125.
Smorodynskyi, V.S. (2009). Ideia pravosuddia v istorii pravnychoi dumky. Pravosuddia: filosofske ta teoretychne osmyslennia – Justice: Philosophical and Theoretical Understanding. V. S. Bihun (Ed.). Kyiv: Biblioteka Mizhnarodnoho chasopysu «Problemy filosofii prava», Part. 2, 46–63 [in Ukrainian].
Platon. Sobranye sochynenyi. A. F. Loseva, Ya. F. Asmusa, A. A. Takho-Hody (Eds.). (1994). (Vols 1–4; Vol. 4). Moscow: Mіsl [in Russian].
Arystotel. Sochynenyia (1983). (Vols 1–4; Vol. 4). Moscow: Misl [in Russian].
Akvinskyi, Toma. (2003). Komentari do Aristotelevoi «Polityky». Kyiv: Vyd-vo Solomii Pavlychko «Osnovy» [in Ukrainian].
Monteske, Sh.–L. (1999). O dukhe zakonov. Moscow: Misl [in Russian].
Tokvyl, Aleksys de. (1992). Demokratyia v Ameryke. Moscow: Prohress [in Russian].
Monrealska universalna deklaratsiia pro nezalezhnist pravosuddia. URL: http://www.judges.org.ua/article/d5.htm [in Ukrainian].
Chornobuk, V. (2013). Nezalezhnist sudovoi vlady yak skladova verkhovenstva prava: finansovo-pravovi aspekty. Yurydychna Ukraina – Legal Ukraine, 12, 42–48 [in Ukrainian].
span lang=UK style='font-size:12.0pt; mso-ansi-language:UK;mso-bidi-font-style:italic'>830 с.
9. Аквінський Тома. Коментарі до Арістотелевої «Політики» / пер. з лат. О. Кислюк. 2-ге вид. Київ: Вид-во Соломії Павличко «Основи», 2003. 795 с.
Монтескье Ш. Л. О духе законов. Москва: Мысль, 1999. 672 с.
Токвиль Алексис де. Демократия в Америке: пер. с франц. / предисл. Гарольда Дж. Ласки. Москва: Прогресс, 1992. 554 с.
Монреальська універсальна декларація про незалежність правосуддя. URL: http://www.judges.org.ua/article/d5.htm (дата звернення: 13.05.2018).
Чорнобук В. Незалежність судової влади як складова верховенства права: фінансово-правові аспекти. Юридична Україна. 2013. № 12. С. 42–48
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Theory and practice of jurisprudence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.