Innovation activity special mode legal forms.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2017.12.118830Keywords:
innovation activity, special, mode, technopolis, forms of special modes, public-private partnershipAbstract
Ukrainian innovation market main disadvantages elimination actualizes special innovation activity mode issue are named. The key issues which slow innovation developing in Ukraineare insufficient funding of innovation activity and high tax pressure on innovative enterprises. Complexed government influence on defined objects of innovation activity special mode allows solving main innovation market disadvantages. Special regimes content is formed by the main legal ways to affect the defined objects. Legal construction of special mode is complicated with: firstly, pluralism of sections forming united system of relationships, secondly, diversity of horizontal (contractual) and vertical (managerial) connections, thirdly, particularity of rules interaction which regulate organizational and industrial relations, fourthly, the need to achieve optimal number of links to provide the effective functioning of the system as a whole. Therefore using such construction to complicated and multi-faceted system of innovation relations allows to direct optimal legal instrumentality to affect the whole system or separate elements to achieve intermediate and ultimate goals of innovation relation regulation. Special mode objects are formed. At the present time innovation activity legally established special mode fundamental form is special economic zone. And special mode object is innovative project. However, special mode may exist with respect to other objects and in other forms. It is determined that special mode form should correspond to any object features. Analysis of Ukrainian national legislation is conducted. It is proposed to consider public-private partnership as one of specially individualized economy management mode possible forms.
References
Ezell, S.J., Nager, A.B., Atkinson, R.D. (2016). Contributors and Detractors: Ranking Countries’ Impact on Global Innovation. URL: http://www2.itif.org/2016-contributors-and-detractors.pdf?_ga=1.178380963.602353758.1458130505.
Davydiuk, O.M. (2010). Hospodarsko-pravove rehuliuvannia obihu tekhnolohii v Ukraini: perspektyvy doopratsiuvannia. Visnyk Natsionalnoi yurydychnoi akademii Ukrainy imeni Yaroslava Mudroho, Seriia: Ekonomichna teoriia i pravo, 2010, 1, 150–158 [in Ukrainian].
Atamanova, Iu.Ie. (2010). Do pytannia pravovoho vyznachennia innovatsiinoi diialnosti. Visnyk Natsionalnoi yurydychnoi akademii Ukrainy imeni Yaroslava Mudroho, Seriia: Ekonomichna teoriia i pravo, 1, 124–133 [in Ukrainian].
Zeldina, O.R. (2007). Teoretychni aspekty spetsialnoho rezhymu hospodariuvannia: Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Donetsk [in Ukrainian].
Zadykhailo, D.V. (2010). Kodyfikatsiia innovatsiinoho zakonodavstva: okremi kontseptualno-pravovi pidkhody. Visnyk Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy, 4 (63), 177–185 [in Ukrainian].
Denysov, A.I. (2017). Hospodarsko-pravove zabezpechennia tekhnolohichnoi bezpeky derzhavy. Kharkiv: Yurait [in Ukrainian].
Komentar do Hospodarskoho kodeksu Ukrainy. URL: http://legalexpert.in.ua/komkodeks/hku.html [in Ukrainian].
Pro innovatsiinu diialnist: Zakon Ukrainy vid 04.07.2002 r. № 40-IV. URL: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/40-15.
Pro innovatsiinu diialnist: Zakon Ukrainy vid 04.07.2002 r. № 40-IV. URL: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/40-15.
Pro naukovi parky: Zakon Ukrainy vid 25.06.2009 r. № 1563-VI. URL: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1563-17.
Pashynska, K.S. (2015). Formy derzhavno-pryvatnoho partnerstva. Ekonomichnyi analiz, Vol. 22, 1, 48–52 [in Ukrainian].
Davydiuk, O.M. (2010). Tekhnolohiia yak ob’iekt hospodarsko-pravovoho rehuliuvannia: Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Simson, O. (2011). Derzhavno-pryvatne partnerstvo v innovatsiinii sferi. Visnyk Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy, 4, 222–230. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vapny_2011_4_24 [in Ukrainian].
Simson, O. (2012). Pravova pryroda vidnosyn derzhavno-pryvatnoho partnerstva v innovatsiinii sferi. Visnyk akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy, № 1, 233–241. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vapny_2012_1_25 [in Ukrainian].
Fedchenko, M.A., Kosach, I.A. (2013). Derzhavno-pryvatne partnerstvo v innovatsiinii sferi: ukrainskyi ta zarubizhnyi dosvid. Visnyk Chernihivskoho derzhavnoho tekhnolohichnoho universytetu. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky, 2, 365–371. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vcndtue_2013_2_55 [in Ukrainian].
Teslenko, I.V., Dolgih, M.N. Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo v sisteme obrazovanija: trendy, problemy, perspektivy. URL: https://www.fundamental-research.ru/ru/article/view?id=39910 [in Rssian].
Vrublevska, K.M. (2016). Osnovni pravovi formy investuvannia innovatsiinoho produktu. Ekonomichna teoriia ta pravo, 3, 188–203. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vnyua_etp_2016_3_16 [in Ukrainian].
Hladka, O.V. (2014). Tekhnolohiia yak skladova predmeta dohovoru komertsiinoi kontsesii. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Iurydychna akademiia Ukrainy imeni Yaroslava Mudroho». Seriia: Ekonomichna teoriia ta pravo, 2, 188–197. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vnyua_etp_2014_2_21 [in Ukrainian].
Hladka, O.V. (2013). Komertsiina kontsesiia yak skladova innovatsiino-investytsiinoi polityky derzhavy. Yuryst Ukrainy, 4, 72–78. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/uy_2013_4_13 [in Ukrainian].
Demchyshak, N.B., Hamarovska, N.R. (2013). Rol franchaizynhu v stymuliuvanni investytsiino-innovatsiinoho rozvytku ekonomiky Ukrainy. Naukovyi visnyk NLTU Ukrainy, issue 23.4, 203–210. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/nvnltu_2013_23. [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Theory and practice of jurisprudence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
