Involvement of a body of specialists in investigative actions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2017.12.117310

Keywords:

special knowledge, group of specialists, investigation of crimes

Abstract

The changes in the criminal procedural legislation and judicial reform in Ukraine make the investigator conduct a qualitative and prompt investigation. To do this, in many cases, special knowledge of a team of specialists is needed. In the works of scientists, some problems of participation of a group of specialists in the investigation were considered. A.A. Vainshtein, V.V. Kovalenko, V.M. Makhov, E.B. Melnikova, M.O. Selivanov, V.V. Tsirkal, G.O. Chorniy and other scientists. However the organizational issues remained unexplored. Therefore the aim of the article is to investigate organizational problems when involving a group of specialists in the investigation of crimes.

While planning investigative actions (search activities) with involvement of a body of specialists, an investigator determines how many specialists he/she needs and the institution from which specialists must be involved. While planning investigative actions (search activities), an investigator may consult a body of specialists. During immediate investigation or search activities, an investigator must determine functions of each specialist and his/her form of involvement. An investigator should involve subject-matter experts or generalists in investigation of the case. A body of specialists predominantly takes part in searches, site inspections and crime re-enactments. In some cases, it is the defence, who involves specialists in crime investigation. It is also important for an investigator to consult with a body of specialists following investigative actions (search activities).

Author Biography

Вікторія Олегівна Яремчук, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

Candidate of Law, Assistant Professor of

department of Criminalistics

References

Vajnshtejn, A.A. (1966). Uchastie specialistov v sledstvennom osmotre: avtoreferat dissertacii kandidata juridicheskih nauk. Moscow [in Russian].

Gross, Gans (1908). Rukovodstvo dlja sudebnyh sledovatelej, kak sistema kriminalistiki. 4-d ed. Sankt-Peterburg: Tipogr. M. Merkusheva [in Russian].

Ekspertyzy u sudochynstvi Ukrainy. V.H. Honcharenka ta I.V. Hory (Eds.). (2015). Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter [in Ukrainian].

Kitseliuk, V.M. (2017). Rozsliduvannia porushen vstanovlenykh zakonodavstvom vymoh pozhezhnoi bezpeky. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Kovalenko, V.V. (2007). Zastosuvannia naukovo-tekhnichnykh zasobiv spetsialistamy pry provedenni slidchykh dii. Luhansk: RVV LDUVS [in Ukrainian].

Kryminalistyka, V.V. Tishchenka (Ed.). (2017). Odesa: Vyd. dim «Helvetyka» [in Ukrainian].

Mahov, V.N. (1975). Uchastie specialistov v sledstvennyh dejstvijah. Moscow: IIPP [in Russian].

Melnikova, Je.B. (1964). Uchastie specialistov v sledstvennyh dejstvijah. Moscow: Juridicheskaja literatura [in Russian].

Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo po proizvodstvu sudebnyh jekspertiz dlja jekspertov i specialistov. T.V. Aver'janovoj, V.F. Statkusa (Eds). (2011). Moscow: Jurajt [in Russian].

elivanov, N.A. (1973). Privlechenie specialistov k rassledovaniju (Obzor praktiki po materialam sledstvenyh organov prokuratury). Moskva: VNIIPP [in Russian].

Simakova-Iefremian, E.B. (2016). Kompleksni sudovo-ekspertni doslidzhennia: teoriia ta praktyka. Kharkiv, Pravo [in Ukrainian].

Skandalnuju sudebnuju reformu prinjali. Glavnye normy dokumenta. URL: https://strana.ua/news/96364-sudebnaja-reforma-2017-hlavnye-tezisy-zakona.html [in Russian].

Hrustalev, V.N. Trubicyn, R.Ju. (2003). Uchastie specialista-kriminalista v sledstvennyh dejstvijah. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter [in Russian].

Cirkal, V.V. (1984). Taktika proizvodstva sledstvennyh dejstvij s uchastiem specialisto. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kiev [in Russian].

Cirkal, V.V. (1979). Uchastie gruppy specialistov v sledstvennyh dejstvijah. Kriminalistika i sudebnaja jekspertiza, issue 19, 59–64 [in Russian].

Chornyi, H.O. (2016). Osoblyvosti taktyky dii spetsialista pry ohliadi mistsia podii, pov’iazanoho z vybukhom. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia Pravo, issue 21, 167–170 [in Ukrainian].

Shapoval, O.V. (2017). Kryminalistychne zabezpechennia rozsliduvannia ekonomichnykh zlochyniv. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Shevchenko, O. V. (2017) Vykorystannia spetsialnykh tovaroznavchykh znan pid chas dosudovoho rozsliduvannia. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Shepitko, V.Iu. (2017). Novely protsesualnoi rehlamentatsii dopytu eksperta i yoho taktyka. Arotskerivski chytannia: proceedings of the Scientific and Practical Conference. Kharkiv: Pravo, 5-7 [in Ukrainian].

Yaremchuk, V.O. (2015). Orhanizatsiia i taktyka zaluchennia spetsialista pry provedenni slidchykh (rozshukovykh). Kharkiv: Apostil [in Ukrainian].

Published

2017-12-19

How to Cite

Яремчук, В. О. (2017). Involvement of a body of specialists in investigative actions. Theory and Practice of Jurisprudence, 2(12), 16. https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2017.12.117310

Issue

Section

CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY