Application of limitation period to the requirements about confession invalid decisions of general meeting: analysis of judicial practice

Abstract

Problem setting. In a modern period often enough declare requirements about confession invalid decisions of the general meeting. The imperfection of the legislative adjusting invalid decisions of the general meeting stipulated both in a doctrine and in judicial practice far of problems related to limitation period (for example, proliferation/non-proliferation limitation period, his type and beginning to run).

Recent research and publications analysis. To research application of limitation period to the requirements about confession invalid decisions of the general meeting, in particular, such researchers applied as P. Gusakovs'kiy, O. Pecheniy, І. Spasibo-Fateeva.

Paper objective. Appropriate analysis of contemporary issues application of limitation period to the requirements about confession invalid decisions of general meeting actually unavailable. But, of course, there is a theoretical and utilitarian need, at a minimum, to proliferation/non-proliferation limitation period, his type and beginning to run.

Paper main body. The article is sanctified to research application of limitation period to the requirements about confession invalid decisions of the general meeting. In the article analyses application of limitation period to the requirements about confession invalid decisions of the general meeting in judicial practice through a prism: proliferation/non-proliferation limitation period, his type and beginning to run.

Conclusions of the research. It is offered to for providing definiteness in civil relations and stability of civil turnover to unify and set short limitation period for any requirements about confession invalid decisions of the general meeting.